“Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the parliamentary secretary to the government House leader for his passion for Canadian farmers and Canadian agriculture, and then I want to add to that. He has reiterated that our government is clearly willing to bring affordability measures to help Canadians at this crisis time. Twice, we have exempted the fuel tax, with Bill C-30 and Bill C-38. However, let us not forget that some of those fuel taxes actually go back to municipalities to help with critical infrastructure. We cannot predict what the situation is going to be in the Strait of Hormuz and whether that is going to be resolved soon. It would be irresponsible to extend past the time frame that we can predict, what the revenues would be and what the benefits for Canadians would be. Would the member agree?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 37%Reasoning 63%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 4 wordsyes, I would agree.Reasoning · 63 wordsThat is one of the reasons why I brought up how there is no one inside the House of Commons who can make a prediction about what the price is going to be in six, seven or eight months with any absolute certainty.That is because of what is taking place in the Strait of Hormuz and in the Middle East in general.Claims · 33 wordsThe manner in which we are bringing forward the excise tax relief on gasoline is the most appropriate way.1It is the responsible way to plan for the budget going into the future.
