Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Luc Berthold

115 words · 6 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, as I have indicated to the member across the way, I applaud him and give him a tremendous amount of credit for having the courage to present his personal family situation. It takes a great deal of courage to do so. I think it is a great tribute to David, quite frankly, in recognizing that all lives do matter. I want to go back to the issue of the principle, because I think that is critically important here. This can happen to anyone. Young people can cross a road, and it can be very difficult as a direct result. This why it is important that, as legislators, we take that into consideration when we talk about the Criminal Code or budgetary measures. Could the member provide his thoughts on that?”
Statement grade
A
Average 91 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 6%Claims 43%Reasoning 50%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordsI will try to answer in English.Procedure Claims · 17 wordsThis bill could change the lives of a lot of kids and young people in this country. Reasoning · 16 wordsBy principle, I think all of us are here to make life better for every Canadian. Claims · 33 wordsWe do not always agree on the way to do it, but on this particular file, I am really proud that everyone is supporting the fact that we have a role to play. Reasoning · 42 wordsWe can help if we just change some little words in the legislative agenda or in bills. Yes, I think we will act on principle to help people if we put partisanship aside and do something really good for our young people.Vague promise

Analysed on