Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kelly McCauley

Conservative on Building Canada Strong Act 2026-10-06

62 words · 2 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Arielle Kayabaga (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, I heard my hon. colleague talk about this. I think it is easy to say government needs to get out of the way, or we need less government, without really putting into words what that actually means to real people. The bill is a proposal to put in a one-year review timeline. What would the member propose to make things move forward so these investments can actually make it to the communities and the businesses who need them, other than just slogans or getting government out of the way?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

The ask 50%Claims 50%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, The ask · 31 wordsthere is a very simple solution: get rid of Bill C-69, the “no new pipelines” bill, ¹and get rid of Bill C-48, which bans Alberta oil off the northern B.C. coast.² Claims · 31 wordsThese two pieces of government legislation are responsible for the killing of more investment in this country than anything else Trudeau or anyone else in the government could have thought of.

At a glance

AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Bill C-69, the “no new pipelines” bill”Federal Bill C-69 is commonly known as the “no new pipelines” bill.search
2“bans Alberta oil off the northern B.C. coast”Federal Bill C-48 bans Alberta oil tanker traffic off the northern British Columbia coast.search

Analysed on 2026-10-19