“Madam Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague from Repentigny for his excellent speech. Now, for the other Liberal MPs who may have forgotten, it is not just a question of Bill C-39. There is also Bill C-5 from 2025, which currently suspends certain Canadian laws and gives cabinet the power to repeal other laws that get in the way. Bill C-5 remains unchanged, then we have Bill C-39 and, now, they add in regions of national interest. Obviously that is not the only provision in Bill C-39. There are other areas for improvement, because they render Canada’s other laws weak and ineffective. I simply want to ask my colleague whether it is possible to envisage improving anything in Bill C-39 while, at the same time, addressing the disaster that is Bill C-5.”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 94 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Reasoning · 24 wordsBill C-39 is such a disaster from start to finish that I really cannot see how it could be improved to make it acceptable.The ask · 28 wordsTo be perfectly honest, it should be scrapped entirely.The government should go back to the drawing board and reaffirm that, in Canada, we respect statutes and regulations.Promise · 6 wordsYes, we will speed up projects, Vague promiseReasoning · 19 wordsbut that will include consulting local communities, protecting the environment and, above all, safeguarding our children’s health as well.Claims · 14 wordsThat is not what the Liberals are doing.They are doing exactly the opposite.Positioning · 12 wordsIn my view, this bill should simply be sent to the shredder.Positioning
