“Madam Speaker, let us be honest, we have a Prime Minister who loves oil, who always wants more oil, and who wants to produce more oil. I wonder if he takes his cereal with oil for breakfast. That is what Bill C-39 is for: to facilitate projects like these and circumvent the law. We heard the member for Madawaska—Restigouche tell us we are mistaken and that the goal is to generate clean electricity. He says that is what it is for. I would like my colleague to explain how we in Quebec managed to build the La Grande-1 projects, namely the James Bay and La Romaine hydroelectric complexes and the wind farms. How did we build Quebec’s economy around renewable energy without legislation such as Bills C-5, C-15 and C-39? Did members know that when we heat our homes in Quebec, we use renewable energy? How come we have been able to do this, but our oil-loving Prime Minister has not?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 69%Positioning 31%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Claims · 40 wordsdoing things right is possible.Quebec is one example.It may not be perfect, but it is getting better.Major wind energy projects are being developed in collaboration with first nations and communities in a way that respects the environment.1Positioning · 18 wordsThat is the future, not oil and gas unfettered by the law, the way the government is proposing.Positioning
