Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Tamara Kronis

Conservative on Building Canada Strong Act 2026-10-06

41 words · 2 sentences · 3 clauses

Replying to Dave Epp (Conservative)

“Madam Speaker, I want to thank my colleague for her excellent speech. I know she reviews legislation very carefully. Bill C-39 purports that it would build things at speeds that generations have not seen. Obviously, that would require the repeal of Bill C-69 and Bill C-48. Is that in part 1, part 2 or part 3? I could not find it. In what part of this massive bill is the repeal of that legislation? Where is it contained?”

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 54%Reasoning 46%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 22 wordsI cannot find the provisions that the member is looking for.¹ What I can find are immense transfers of discretion to cabinet, Reasoning · 19 wordswhich would allow it to define a number of vaguely defined words and do, really, whatever it deems appropriate.Partly on point

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 61

2 of 2 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “What I can find are immense transfers of discretion to cabinet,”About discretionary powers the bill gives cabinet, not the location of the repeal provisions asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “which would allow it to define a number of vaguely defined words and do, really, whatever it deems appropriate.”About vague definitions and cabinet discretion under the bill, not where the repeal is contained.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“I cannot find the provisions that the member is looking for”Bill C-39 does not contain provisions repealing Bill C-69 or Bill C-48.search

Analysed on 2026-10-19