Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Tamara Kronis

Conservative on Building Canada Strong Act 2026-10-06

76 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault (Liberal)

“Madam Speaker, Bill C‑39 is part of a broader context, namely the leadership that our Prime Minister and our government have shown over the past 18 months to strengthen the Canadian economy. Just a few weeks ago, in Toronto, it was announced that more than $500 billion in investments will be injected into Canada, which will help strengthen our economy. Bill C‑39 will make it possible to unlock the full potential of these investments. Does my colleague intend to support Bill C‑39 to ensure that we truly see the full potential of the investments that were announced in Toronto? These investments will continue to pour into the country over the coming year to strengthen our economy.”

Statement grade

Average 94 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 38%Promise 62%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 29 wordsthe member opposite is right that this is part of a series of bills. I believe there were nine or 10 of them, or something like that, in June.Partly on point Promise · 47 wordsI am hoping to get the chance to spend enough time with this legislation to be able to judge exactly what it would do. Once I have that opportunity, I would be pleased to have a conversation with the member about what he thinks it would do.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · 77

3 of 3 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “the member opposite is right that this is part of a series of bills.”About the bill being part of a series, not whether she will support it.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “I believe there were nine or 10 of them,”Counts the bills in the series, not whether she will support this one.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “or something like that, in June.”About when the series of bills came, not whether she will support this one.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-19