Analysis · Members' statement · beta

Wade Chang

Liberal on Public Servants 2026-10-07

147 words · 11 sentences · 13 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 95 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 67%Procedure 4%Reasoning 22%Promise 7%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 30 wordspublic servants are Canadians serving Canadians. This summer, I met with public servants and their families in Burnaby Central.¹ I heard about long commutes, caregiving and balancing work and family. Procedure · 6 wordsI also heard about something important: ProcedureClaims · 14 wordspride in their work. Those conversations highlighted the potential value of flexible work arrangements. Reasoning · 22 wordsWhere operationally appropriate, they can support caregivers, people with disabilities and those facing long commutes, while helping reduce unnecessary travel and emissions. Claims · 17 wordsOur government has a responsibility to ensure that Canada’s public service is productive, accountable and delivering results. Reasoning · 11 wordsA strong public service is built around effective service to Canadians. Claims · 37 wordsFlexible work can be one tool when it supports operational needs and helps deliver results. As parliamentarians, our role is to set direction and understand how that direction is experienced by the people who carry it forward. Promise · 10 wordsI will continue to bring their perspectives to this House.Vague promise

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 94

1 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I also heard about something important:”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 91

1 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “I will continue to bring their perspectives to this House”A commitment with no concrete action, measure or success condition beyond continuing as before.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“This summer, I met with public servants and their families in Burnaby Central”Wade Chang met with public servants and their families in Burnaby Central during the summer of 2026.search

Analysed on 2026-10-19