“Mr. Speaker, that was not the question. Canadian steel and pipelines do not answer why Canadian companies were not consulted about the fabrication of the LNG facility itself. It is out of touch to point to steel used somewhere else in the project while ignoring Canadian fabricators who say that they can have a substantial portion of this work completed here in Canada. The Prime Minister talks about “buy Canadian”, but Canadian companies apparently were not even consulted. Therefore, who determined Canadian industry could not complete the work? Was it LNG Canada, the Liberal government or nobody because no one even bothered to ask?”
Statement grade
B
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 81. The grade is held to 77, 30 above Relevance.
77 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Aside 4%Claims 83%Positioning 12%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Aside · 4 wordsthose are nice comments, AsideClaims · 80 wordsbut they are completely inaccurate.We actually talked to people at the steel companies, 1and they said they cannot service those orders.2They asked us to make sure the rest of the steel was bought in Canada, 3and it will be bought in Canada.The Conservatives are talking down projects that create 6,100 jobs.4They are talking down a project that creates $50 billion to pay for health care, to pay for dental care, to pay for schools and roads.5Positioning · 12 wordsWhy do you not stop talking down Canada, Off pointand start trying to—Positioning
