Replying to Maxime Blanchette-Joncas (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to point out that my colleague has not answered my question. She spoke of high environmental standards. Project assessments must take less than a year. Regardless of the project of national interest in question, the government alone determines what constitutes national interest. Those are not high environmental standards. The simple question I am asking my colleague is this: Can she explain how conducting botched environmental assessments within a single year, regardless of the project, is consistent with the “high environmental standards” she talked about in her speech?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 90 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 36%Reasoning 64%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 27 wordsI think it is really important to recognize that the bill would address changes in governance as well to the ports and other parts of the ecosystem.Partly on pointReasoning · 47 wordsIn terms of making sure that those assessments are done appropriately and well, we are getting to a decision point about whether to move forward.This does not mean that all of the work is completed, but all of those efforts are going to be in place.Vague promise
