Evan Solomon

Madam Speaker, Greeting · 30 wordsit is a great honour to stand here today with my hon. colleagues in the House as we turn our attention to the proposed building Canada strong act, a bill, GreetingClaims · 42 wordsas we know, that would modernize regulatory reviews of major projects in this country and eliminate costly delays and uncertainty for proponents while ensuring that the rights and interests of indigenous peoples are upheld and that we maintain Canada’s world-class environmental standards. Positioning · 48 wordsCanada has a simple question. Can we turn our enormous potential into real jobs, real projects and real prosperity? We have what the world wants. We have the energy, the resources, the technology, the workforce and what cannot be found in many other jurisdictions: We have the trust.Positioning Reasoning · 23 wordsHowever, it is not enough if it takes too long to make a decision, issue a permit or get shovels in the ground. Claims · 32 wordsI do not think I need to remind anybody here that Canada faces an unprecedented economic threat, uncertainty and instability, circumstances that we did not create, that our workers did not create, Reasoning · 19 wordsbut that have forced us to change in order to protect those good jobs, our economy and our sovereignty. Claims · 13 wordsThat is exactly why we are bringing forward the building Canada strong act. Positioning · 6 wordsThis is about moving with urgency.Positioning Claims · 36 wordsIt is about giving Canada a regulatory system that is clear, credible and capable of delivering. It is about doing it without in any way compromising Canada’s world-class environmental protections and while upholding indigenous treaty rights. Reasoning · 63 wordsWe must move faster, but we cannot cut corners. We must protect the environment, but we also must create good jobs. We must build responsibly and with urgency because in the world we face today, delay is not an option. When a responsible project does not move forward, the investment will go somewhere else, the jobs and the opportunities will go somewhere else, Promise · 16 wordsand our government will not let the future be defined by missed opportunities because of delay.Vague promise Claims · 12 wordsThe building Canada strong act proposes changes to a lot of things. Procedure · 3 wordsWe understand that.Procedure Claims · 37 wordsThere would be changes to the Impact Assessment Act, the Building Canada Act, the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, the Fisheries Act, the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, the Species at Risk Act and the Canadian Navigable Waters Act.¹ Aside · 7 wordsThat is a lot of legislative titles, AsideProcedure · 5 wordsbut the purpose is clear.Procedure Claims · 41 wordsIt is to make federal decisions faster, to make the process clearer and to give communities, indigenous partners, workers, investors and Canadians greater certainty about what happens next. We have heard from the public that we do not need weaker standards, Promise · 6 wordsand we will never have those.Vague promise Reasoning · 18 wordsWe need a government that can organize itself and coordinate things to work more responsibly and more expeditiously. Procedure · 16 wordsThat is the balance in this bill: speed and responsibility, growth and protection, ambition and trust.Procedure Claims · 245 wordsThe proposed amendments would create a more coordinated federal process for all major projects, with clear timelines and more predictable decisions. Once a proponent has submitted a complete application with all the required information, federal reviews and decisions would be made within a year.² In simple terms, the work would happen together instead of separately, not one step after another. Impact assessments and permit reviews would proceed at the same time, federal experts would be brought in earlier, duplication would be reduced, and problems would be identified sooner, not at the end of the process when they are hard and, frankly, expensive to solve. The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada is already helping proponents get ready before formal assessment begins.³ It is ensuring close coordination with federal departments and agencies, enhancing co-operation with provinces under landmark agreements for one project, one review, and focusing assessments on key issues within federal jurisdiction. This bill also introduces amendments that would ensure the federal regulator, with the most relevant experience and expertise, is carrying out impact assessments, putting the right expertise in the lead. Under this proposed approach, pipelines, transmission lines and certain offshore renewable energy projects regulated by the Canada Energy Regulator would solely be assessed by the CER through its process under the Canadian Energy Regulator Act.⁴ For nuclear and uranium projects, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission would, logically, conduct impact assessments by following the rigorous process and requirements set out by the Impact Assessment Act.⁵ Positioning · 26 wordsThis is all common sense. These regulators understand these technologies. They understand the risks. They understand the full life cycle of these projects that they regulate.Positioning Procedure · 5 wordsHowever, let me be clear: ProcedureClaims · 92 wordsEnvironmental, health, social, economic and indigenous considerations would continue to be assessed. The standards would remain. The oversight would remain. What would change is the unnecessary duplication between federal processes that slows things down. Another important improvement being introduced through the bill would be the creation of a federal review coordination function and a Crown consultation hub, both to be housed inside the Impact Assessment Agency.⁶ The federal review coordinator would be responsible for ensuring that impact assessments are led by the Impact Assessment Agency and federal permits meet the new timelines. Procedure · 3 wordsThat is key.Procedure Claims · 53 wordsIt would also work with experts in different federal departments to ensure that everything stays organized and on track. The Crown consultation hub would coordinate one clear consultation process for each indigenous group affected by a major project. This would replace multiple overlapping and repetitive federal processes and help reduce, essentially, consultation fatigue. Reasoning · 53 wordsMeaningful consultation matters, but it need not be repetitive. It should not require indigenous partners to repeat the same work for different parts of the same government. Better coordination would ensure the Crown upholds its obligations and would provide indigenous partners a process that is clear, coherent and more respectful of their time. Claims · 213 wordsFurthermore, to ensure clearer, more streamlined project decisions, the government is also proposing legislative changes to move toward a single comprehensive federal decision for major project permits and for approvals, which would result in one federal decision document that would be issued by the Minister of the Environment, Climate Change and Nature.⁷ This document would include all federal decisions required for a project to move forward if it is undergoing a comprehensive impact assessment, while the federal review coordinator would ensure that all relevant federal experts across the government would provide timely advice and any key recommendations needed for that decision. For too long, proponents have had to move from department to department, process to process and decision to decision, creating unnecessary delays and a lot of uncertainty. The cost has been that this country has not remained competitive. This bill is practical and would make practical changes for that. It would move certain decisions, not all, from cabinet to the responsible minister.⁸ Conditions imposed on proponents would need to be technically and economically feasible.⁹ Some early construction activities could actually begin before final impact decisions, ¹⁰but only when the necessary permits have been approved. These are common-sense improvements that would help the federal government make the sound decisions we need to make. Positioning · 30 wordsWhen companies choose Canada, workers benefit. When responsible projects move forward, communities benefit. When we build the infrastructure, energy systems and nation-building projects the world needs, our whole country benefits.Positioning Claims · 17 wordsWe have worked very hard with every province that supports our goal of one project, one review. Procedure · 7 wordsThat matters. This is a team effort.Procedure Claims · 42 wordsProvinces, territories, indigenous rights holders, municipalities, workers, industries and communities all have to play a role, and the changes proposed in Bill C-39 would give us a stronger, more efficient system. As the Prime Minister said, Canada has what the world wants.¹¹ Promise · 31 wordsIt is now up to us to take action, to build our country faster and to create the jobs and opportunities here that will strengthen our economic sovereignty and our country. Positioning · 9 wordsWe are turning Canada and our potential into prosperity.PositioningVague promise Procedure · 4 wordsIt is common sense.Procedure Promise · 18 wordsThere would be no compromise on the environment. There would be no compromise on consultation with indigenous communities. Positioning · 10 wordsThis is about building stronger, building Canadian and building together.Positioning