“Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague does us a great favour. I would ask the member if she can remember the rush that everybody was in, in June 2025, that Bill C-5 had to be passed before we rose for the summer. We went from second reading to royal assent between a Monday and a Friday. There was no time to study it, and no time to think. It was just important to get it passed, because we were in such a hurry, and exactly as she said, not one single project was listed under Bill C-5 until about two weeks ago when the Liberals decided, in cabinet, to say that what they are now calling the Pacific link is the first project. After more than a year, after the rush to pass the bill we could not study, they have now put forward a pipeline, which they could not even accurately describe in the Canada Gazette. Does the member have any thoughts on this?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 95 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 57%Reasoning 28%Positioning 15%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 15 wordsI remember Bill C-5 because it was one of the first bills I voted on.1Reasoning · 21 wordsI was happy to support anything that would bring infrastructure to our country and infrastructure to create a more sovereign country.Claims · 34 wordsI think because of the criticism that the government has had for not creating any projects with Bill C-5, even though it was rushed through so fast, the Liberals made an announcement last week.2Positioning · 13 wordsIs it actually going to happen?Is that project going to come through?PositioningReasoning · 3 wordsI doubt it.
