“Mr. Speaker, I want to follow up on my colleague from Saanich—Gulf Islands’ comment when it comes to Bill C-5. In Bill C-39, proposed section 102 would effectively make the powers that were given to the executive, to exempt under Bill C-5’s framework, absolutely permanent. The Liberals said, when they came under fire for seizing such tremendous powers that have been well written about, that they could originally exempt any project from almost any law that we have on the books, but now, it would essentially take that away. The Liberals originally said, “Trust us. Give us a five-year sunset because of the emergency.” Now they would be taking that power and making it permanent. What—”
Statement grade
–
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little.
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 100%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 26 wordsI would refer back to the provisions included on either end of the approvals process, which would provide a lot of protections, I believe, for Canadians.Partly on point
