“Mr. Speaker, my colleague gave a fine speech about the opinion of his political party. Can he explain to me how he would do a better job defending the benefits of this bill? This bill does not remove standards. Instead, it sets out guidelines to fast-track the implementation of projects so that Canada can be the master in its own house. My colleague argued at length about his opposition to the pipeline, while Canada is diversifying its markets so that it is no longer dependent on a single market, the American market. Why would he not want to support this bill?”
Statement grade
C
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 83. The grade is held to 63, 30 above Signal.
63 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 63%Claims 37%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 58 wordsI would encourage my colleague to do a bit of research and take a look at the information that is out there.Where do our energy exports go?Who owns the gas and oil companies?I always find it amusing when Liberal colleagues talk about being masters in our own house.This has nothing to do with that.PositioningClaims · 41 wordsWhen Quebec decided to buy hydroelectric power to secure its future, that is when we became masters in our own house.1The government is not buying our oil resources; it is leaving them in American hands and paying for the infrastructure.2Positioning · 13 wordsTo me, that is being subservient in our own house, not being masters.Positioning
