Replying to Caroline Desrochers (Liberal). The question was off topic, so this reply is judged against the bill.
“Mr. Speaker, my colleague is talking about things that are historic. What is historic is a government that was elected just 18 months ago and that has already started delivering on its promises. During the 2025 election campaign, we were very clear that we wanted to get building quickly. In addition to building and moving forward with the Major Projects Office, we also launched the electrification strategy, the nuclear strategy, the strategy to protect nature and Build Canada Homes. We are building. I would like my colleague to tell me a bit about his solutions for helping Canada get through these times and really lay out a vision for Canada’s future.”
Statement grade
A–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 86 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 68 wordsI have plenty of solutions.We can support the industries we have here, including lumber, aluminum and renewable energy.We already have that in place.We can invest in modernization.We can invest in innovation.These are all things that are possible.We can improve secondary and tertiary processing instead of selling our resources at a discount on international markets.These are all things that can be done.Partly on pointProcedure · 13 wordsI understand what my colleague is trying to argue.It is quite difficult.ProcedureThe question · 25 wordsOnce again, I would like the government members to explain how they managed to buy a pipeline without having passed the bill currently before us.1Claims · 14 wordsThey want to buy another one, but they just want to do it faster.Positioning · 4 wordsIt is utter nonsense.Positioning