Don Davies

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 27 wordsI am rising to add my voice in support of the question of privilege raised by the hon. House leader from the official opposition on Tuesday evening.¹Procedure Reasoning · 126 wordsAs members know, it is a well-established principle of this place that while government has the right, the ability and, in many cases, the obligation to speak to the public and to consult on potential legislation before it is introduced, once a bill is placed on the Order Paper it becomes a matter for Parliament. That is why Speakers have consistently ruled that premature disclosure of a bill on notice can constitute a breach of the collective rights and privileges of the House and its members, specifically our fundamental right to be informed first about government legislation. Various Speakers have ruled on this matter, finding that disclosure of even partial elements of legislation can constitute a violation and ultimately is a prima facie breach of privilege. Claims · 55 wordsWe heard on Tuesday evening a very compelling argument from the member for Regina—Qu’Appelle that there were details about Bill C-40 published in media reports, based on unnamed sources, that were neither known prior to the bill being placed on notice nor related to the title of the bill, ²as found on the Order Paper. Positioning · 11 wordsUnfortunately, we are seeing a concerning pattern from the Liberal government.Positioning Claims · 23 wordsOver the last year, there have been repeated leaks from so-called unauthorized sources to journalists in a clear attempt to shape public discourse. Reasoning · 68 wordsThis is sharp practice, somewhat devious but, arguably, not prohibited. However, when this happens after a bill has been placed on the Order Paper but before parliamentarians have had the opportunity to look at it, this becomes an objectionable attempt to breach the privileges of members and avoid the proper oversight Canadians expect from this House. This is a concerning pattern that, we respectfully submit, must be stopped. Positioning · 8 wordsIt demonstrates a disrespect for our democratic institution, PositioningReasoning · 51 wordsand we believe a clear message must be sent to the government that end-running Parliament in this manner is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. We submit that it is vitally important that members of Parliament assert our fundamental rights to receive details about legislation prior to members of the media. The ask · 12 wordsRespectfully, Mr. Speaker, we ask that you uphold this fundamental parliamentary privilege.