Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Sandra Cobena

104 words · 3 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to put this as simply as I can. At the end of the day, we have a motion about affordability. Consistently, over the last 18 months, since Canadians went to the polls and elected a new government with a new Prime Minister, we have witnessed Conservative after Conservative stand up and vote against affordability measures to support our children, support our seniors and cut taxes. These are the types of things the Conservatives have been voting against. They talk about affordability, but when it comes down to voting for good programs, they vote no. Why?”
Statement grade
A+
Average 100 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 91%Reasoning 9%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 22 wordsthere have been two questions from the Liberal benches and not once have the Liberals recognized that there is an affordability crisis, 1Reasoning · 9 wordswhich is at the heart of the problem today. Claims · 73 wordsThe Liberals can get up and list all of the government programs, but what Canadians are saying, which the Liberals refuse to listen to after sharing hundreds of stories from Canadians, is they want to be able to provide for themselves. They want the government to get out of the way and stop the overspending so that they can provide for themselves and get ahead, and the Liberals are refusing to recognize that.

Analysed on