← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 87 / 100
Signal
61 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 54% Positioning 32% The question 14%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 54 words the Liberals are defending Bill C-39, 1 which will push pipeline projects through by scrapping environmental laws.2 Today, the Canadian Climate Institute revealed that greenhouse gas emissions in Canada did not fall in 2025; 3 instead, they rose to nearly 700 million tonnes.4 The 2025 increase is equivalent to adding one million vehicles to the roads.5 Positioning · 32 words The Liberals have forgotten that the aim is to pollute less, not more. Just imagine if, on top of that, they let their Prime Minister push Bill C-39 through and build pipelines. Positioning The question · 14 words Do they realize that their silence is setting us on a course for disaster?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning ×2
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 61
2 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Liberals have forgotten that the aim is to pollute less, not more.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Just imagine if, on top of that, they let their Prime Minister push Bill C-39 through and build pipelines.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the Liberals are defending Bill C-39” The Liberal government is defending Bill C-39, a bill under debate in the House as of October 2026. search 2 “will push pipeline projects through by scrapping environmental laws” Bill C-39 would advance pipeline projects by removing environmental laws. search 3 “the Canadian Climate Institute revealed that greenhouse gas emissions in Canada did not fall in 2025” The Canadian Climate Institute reported that Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions did not fall in 2025. search 4 “they rose to nearly 700 million tonnes” Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions rose to nearly 700 million tonnes in 2025. search 5 “The 2025 increase is equivalent to adding one million vehicles to the roads” The increase in Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2025 is equivalent to adding one million vehicles to the roads. search
