“Mr. Speaker, how would life be different for Canadians had the pipeline to the Pacific that was approved by the Harper government been allowed to proceed? How long is the minimum it would take for that pipeline to be built?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 6%Claims 75%Reasoning 20%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 8 wordsI have a lot to say about that.ProcedureClaims · 103 wordsThe first thing I would like to say is we would be an energy superpower.Vague promiseWe would have a stockpile.We would be able to control our fuel prices.Vague promiseFarmers would not be facing twice the price in fuel costs from year to year.The actual building of a pipeline, if the bureaucracy of the Liberal government was not in the way, could be accomplished in a couple of years.The problem is that the Liberals continue to not consult with the provinces and they leave it to the last minute, and the next thing we know, the project is stalled or cancelled.Reasoning · 27 wordsWe cannot build pipelines with government money.It needs to be the private sector building these projects, because they will then get done in a reasonable time.
