Analysis · Debate question · beta

Warren Steinley

206 words · 9 sentences · 16 clauses

Following a speech by Ryan Turnbull (Liberal)
“Madam Speaker, the hon. member for Regina—Lewvan and I have had lots of spirited debates in this House before, and I appreciate his question. I do have a family. I have three daughters and a wife. I am very proud of them and very happy to support them. I do a lot of the grocery shopping in my family and, in fact, a lot of the cooking, which I enjoy very much. The member opposite should be able to recognize the way household budgets work. People might save money on child care, save money on dental care, get a Canada child benefit cheque, get the groceries and essentials benefit or benefit from the income tax cut given to 22 million Canadians. There are a number of other programs, measures and benefits that our government has put in place. By my estimate, for the average family of four in my riding of Whitby, and I am sure it is the same in the member opposite’s riding, there is approximately $30,000 a year of savings to the household budget. That is over a course of a year, so divide that by 12 months. It is a significant amount. My family is a good example, but I think for many families across my riding, there are significant savings. That does not directly address the cost of groceries, which I acknowledge are a challenge for families, but with those costs decreasing, families on fixed incomes are able to afford the essentials and the things they need. Let us be honest. The groceries and essentials benefit is specifically designed to increase the GST rebate in order to address the very issue the member opposite is pointing to. The national school food program is another example of how we are saving families money. It is essentially for children from lower-income families. In fact, it has universal access, and so any family whose kid is going to school and may not have the nutritional support they need from their household is able to access school lunches or breakfast programs all across the country. That is 400,000 more kids who are able to eat at school and get the sustenance they need to learn, grow and develop. The member opposite voted against many of these measures. I am not sure how he can stand up and lecture us about the price of groceries when in fact he voted against the very supports we put in place as a government that affect household budgets. Remember, we cut tax on income, housing and fuel. We cut tax on new business investment, making Canada the most tax-competitive advanced economy in the entire world, by the way. That is the productivity mega deduction. It is very hard for me to stand here and listen to the member opposite’s question. I get that he wants to ask his question, but I think he should acknowledge the facts. With household budgets, when people can save money in one or two other places, it better enables them to afford the monthly costs of groceries and essentials.”
Statement grade
A
Average 91 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 3%Claims 73%Positioning 11%Aside 7%Procedure 1%Reasoning 5%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Thanks · 6 wordsI thank the member for Whitby, ThanksClaims · 7 wordsbut he did not answer the question, Positioning · 18 wordsbecause he does not want to tell the actual truth about what is going on with grocery prices.Motive imputed Aside · 14 wordsHe is kind of channelling his inner Jean Chrétien: A proof is a proof.1Aside Claims · 6 wordsThe member talked about child care. Procedure · 1 wordsWell, ProcedureClaims · 57 wordsif a person is lucky enough to hit the lottery and get a government-subsidized child care spot, they are saving that money, but for everyone across Saskatchewan, it is actually called a child care wasteland because there are so few spots. In Saskatchewan, 30% to 40% of the people are waiting for that subsidized child care spot.2 Reasoning · 11 wordsThey are not saving the money this guy is talking about. Positioning · 4 wordsIt is actually ridiculous.Positioning Claims · 80 wordsAlso, I have friends who have kids in child care now, and because the money does not actually cover the cost to hire people and to feed the kids, they are charging parents another $100 or $200 to help cover the cost.3 Parents are paying more out of their pocket because the money the government has given for the day care spots does not cover the cost it is supposed to, for those children to get the care they want, Procedure · 2 wordsso I—Procedure

Analysed on