Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Jeff Kibble

Conservative on First Nations Clean Water Act 2026-10-09

46 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)

“Madam Speaker, I am glad to hear that the member supports the legislation and wants it to go to committee. That is a very positive gesture. The government, I believe, has great intent of looking at an issue that has been an issue for generations now. I can recall, even when I was an MLA, the water advisories in the province of Manitoba. I believe there is a lot of good public will for more action. Our Prime Minister, newly elected less than a year and a half ago, has brought forward substantive legislation. I believe we are moving in the right direction. Could the member provide his thoughts in regard to having the bill go to committee sooner as opposed to later?”

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 11%Reasoning 46%Promise 43%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 5 wordsthe member said “great intent”.¹ Reasoning · 21 wordsUnfortunately, great intent does not bring results. We have seen with Bill C-61 that there has been a lack of results, Promise · 20 wordsso I look forward to the committee’s working with Bill C-37 to this time collaborate and finally get some results.

At a glance

AnsweredOf this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the member said “great intent””Kevin Lamoureux said ‘great intent’ during the debate on Bill C-37 on 2026-10-09.search

Analysed on 2026-10-19