Thanks 0% Reasoning 12% Positioning 26% Claims 51% Aside 8% Procedure 1% The question 2%
Structure · 70 steps
Claims · 18
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Thanks · 5 words thank you for the reminder. Thanks Reasoning · 9 words A high-level banker needs to get paid his worth. Positioning · 11 words People like that do not dine on chicken nuggets at McDonald’s. Positioning Claims · 7 words They eat what ordinary people cannot afford. Positioning · 8 words Do my colleagues know how much he makes? Positioning Claims · 33 words He makes twice as much as the Minister of Finance and National Revenue. He makes more than the Prime Minister. He makes more than the Governor General and that is no mean feat. Positioning · 12 words It is quite something. In fact, our current Prime Minister’s financial-sector friend, Positioning Claims · 8 words or colleague at least, earns $700,000 a year.1 Positioning · 7 words Even that was not enough for him. Positioning Claims · 8 words Within six months, he was threatening to resign. Positioning · 6 words It was too little for him. Positioning Claims · 11 words In fact, he found out there were public servants in government. Positioning · 5 words That was the last straw. Positioning Claims · 32 words Since he was allergic to public servants, he started blackmailing the government. In the end, he did not resign.16 He is still around. Apparently, he is still in his office in Toronto.17 Aside · 14 words I do not know if he has ever been seen in the agency’s offices, Aside Claims · 5 words but he is still there. Aside · 12 words The funny thing is that an agency was created just for him. Aside Off point Claims · 13 words This is the agency that was supposed to be created under Bill C-31.5 Procedure · 8 words I did say that it is a bill. Procedure Claims · 28 words It is not even a law yet, 6 Off point and now the government is introducing Bill C-40 to scrap what was in Bill C-31 and create a new crown corporation.7 Aside · 8 words Maybe it will become the “House of Guzman”. Aside Off point Positioning · 19 words Essentially, this will eliminate what was already tailor-made for the Prime Minister’s buddy and make his life even easier. Positioning Aside · 8 words That is my take on all of this. Aside Off point Claims · 25 words We are essentially creating a new entity with a new board of directors and a new corporate headquarters, the location of which is still unknown.8 Positioning · 14 words We know that the current CEO is very fond of his offices in Toronto. Positioning Aside · 16 words We do not know if that is where it will end up, but I hope not. Aside Reasoning · 16 words However, it seems that it will be up to the corporation to decide that later on. Off point Aside · 16 words Interestingly enough, when we go through a Crown corporation to make purchases worth billions of dollars, Aside Claims · 61 words as is currently planned, that Crown corporation will not need all the usual government approvals to proceed and move forward with its decisions.11 Sometimes, the Treasury Board may not have a say.12 The much-vaunted new Crown corporation will have all sorts of powers, such as the power to make advance payments, provide loan guarantees, lend money and even buy company shares.9 The question · 5 words What would the limits be? Off point Claims · 47 words It is not 100% clear. Apparently, for less than $1 billion, it will not even need to ask the government for permission unless explicitly requested by the government.10 The bill says that it will create a defence agency that will be at arm’s length from the government.13 Aside · 18 words I always find it interesting when people say that it will be at arm’s length from the government. Aside Off point Claims · 53 words When we look at who sits on the board of directors, we see that the deputy minister will be there. The members of the board of directors—it is not an army, it is five people—are all going to be appointed by the government. This can be found in subclause 9(2) of Bill C‑40. Positioning · 6 words We cannot make this stuff up. Positioning Off point Claims · 22 words The Corporation must do as the Minister directs, and doing so is deemed to be in the best interests of the Corporation. Reasoning · 16 words This obviously means that the corporation is not at all at arm’s length from the minister. Claims · 9 words The minister can direct the corporation to do anything. Positioning · 19 words There is no real independence. It is kind of a smokescreen to say that it is at arm’s length. Positioning Claims · 36 words It will be able to be blamed when poor decisions are made, but ultimately, all decisions will still go through the minister’s office. The only difference is that there will be less transparency and less accountability. Positioning · 5 words We are concerned about that. Positioning Off point Procedure · 5 words Here is a legitimate question: Procedure The question · 27 words Do we really want what will probably be hundreds of billions of dollars of procurement to be completely out of the government’s hands and be completely apolitical? Positioning · 9 words That seems like a lot of money to me. Positioning Off point Reasoning · 45 words I think that it is reasonable to be able to raise questions and that there should be some political oversight when such huge amounts are involved. Calling for politics to be taken out of something is often a way to claim the moral high ground. Off point Claims · 23 words Defence already has the ability to identify its own requirements. When it comes to procurement, there are often strategic, geopolitical and industrial implications. Positioning · 35 words I think that political considerations have been overly demonized. I am not suggesting that it should be driven by patronage or handed out to Liberal Party cronies. That is what is likely going to happen: Positioning Claims · 24 words the Prime Minister appoints one of his friends and wants as little accountability as possible. Off point Hundreds of billions of dollars will end up there, Positioning · 17 words and they will spend it however they want. I am not sure that is the best solution. Positioning Claims · 20 words We are told it will move faster, but we were also told that we were going to build more housing. Positioning · 29 words I call that slogan-based governance. Every time there is a problem, the government makes grand promises and comes up with catchy slogans. Ultimately, it does not produce tangible results. Positioning Claims · 40 words That is the case, for example, with Build Canada Homes. We were told that 500,000 homes would be built.2 The report we saw recently stated that we were quite far off and not even half the target had been reached.3 Positioning · 5 words We keep creating new structures: Positioning Claims · 23 words the financial crimes agency, Build Canada Homes, a defence bank, the Major Projects Office and the Canada strong fund—the much-vaunted sovereign wealth fund. Reasoning · 12 words Normally, a sovereign wealth fund consists of money that has been saved. Claims · 10 words In this case, however, it is being financed through borrowing. Positioning · 16 words We are constantly seeing slogan-based governance, with too little attention paid to solving the real problems. Positioning Off point Claims · 37 words According to an internal report from the Canadian Armed Forces, it takes anywhere from four to 24 years to deliver a simple procurement project in Canada and from 10 to 28 years to deliver a complex one.4 Positioning · 16 words That is a serious problem. Off point However, I am not convinced that it is a structural problem. Positioning Reasoning · 7 words It may well be a cultural one. Positioning · 26 words How do we explain the fact that, among all NATO countries and all Five Eyes countries, none has needed a Crown corporation to manage military procurement? Positioning Claims · 10 words Apparently, Canada is the only one that would require one.18 Aside · 16 words I have a hard time making sense of what the government is presenting to us today. Aside Off point Positioning · 27 words It strikes me as just another arrangement under which decisions will be made behind closed doors and well-connected individuals will be free to do as they please. Positioning Claims · 89 words I find that deeply troubling, particularly since we have learned that the procurement ombud will not even have a say in the decisions that will be made by this new entity.14 For example, a company that believes it has been treated unfairly during the process will have no recourse because the Crown corporation will be the one that makes the decisions, period.15 No one will have the authority to review the decisions made by this agency, which will no longer even be an agency but rather a Crown corporation. Positioning · 55 words What we are also seeing with the creation of these new structures, as I said, is a tendency on the part of this government to want to create new structures by saying that they represent a blank slate, that the government needs to be given a chance and that a blank slate is beyond reproach. Positioning Off point Claims · 17 words We are told that we need to act in good faith and give the government a chance. Reasoning · 31 words However, what we have seen is that all these blank slates and new structures are generally designed to reduce accountability to Parliament, resulting in decisions being made increasingly behind closed doors. Hidden agency Positioning · 5 words I find that rather troubling, Positioning Off point Reasoning · 23 words because we should expect greater transparency and accountability, not less, especially when even more money is being invested in defence and other priorities.
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×55 Positioning ×31 Aside ×9 Procedure ×2 Thanks Hidden agency
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 58
43 of 99 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “thank you for the reminder.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “People like that do not dine on chicken nuggets at McDonald’s.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Do my colleagues know how much he makes?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is quite something.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “In fact, our current Prime Minister’s financial-sector friend,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Even that was not enough for him.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It was too little for him.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That was the last straw.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “I do not know if he has ever been seen in the agency’s offices,” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “The funny thing is that an agency was created just for him.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I did say that it is a bill.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “Maybe it will become the “House of Guzman”.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Essentially, this will eliminate what was already tailor-made for the Prime Minister’s buddy and make his life even easier.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “That is my take on all of this.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We know that the current CEO is very fond of his offices in Toronto.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “We do not know if that is where it will end up,” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “but I hope not.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “Interestingly enough, when we go through a Crown corporation to make purchases worth billions of dollars,” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “I always find it interesting when people say that it will be at arm’s length from the government.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We cannot make this stuff up.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “There is no real independence.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is kind of a smokescreen to say that it is at arm’s length.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are concerned about that.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Here is a legitimate question:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That seems like a lot of money to me.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I think that political considerations have been overly demonized.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I am not suggesting that it should be driven by patronage or handed out to Liberal Party cronies.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is what is likely going to happen:” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and they will spend it however they want.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I am not sure that is the best solution.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I call that slogan-based governance.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Every time there is a problem, the government makes grand promises and comes up with catchy slogans.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Ultimately, it does not produce tangible results.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We keep creating new structures:” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We are constantly seeing slogan-based governance, with too little attention paid to solving the real problems.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is a serious problem.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “However, I am not convinced that it is a structural problem.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “How do we explain the fact that, among all NATO countries and all Five Eyes countries, none has needed a Crown corporation to manage military procurement?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “I have a hard time making sense of what the government is presenting to us today.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It strikes me as just another arrangement under which decisions will be made behind closed doors and well-connected individuals will be free to do as they please.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What we are also seeing with the creation of these new structures,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “as I said, is a tendency on the part of this government to want to create new structures by saying that they represent a blank slate, that the government needs to be given a chance and that a blank slate is beyond reproach.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I find that rather troubling,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 54
55 of 99 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “A high-level banker needs to get paid his worth.” The clause offers a general commentary on high-level bankers’ compensation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “People like that do not dine on chicken nuggets at McDonald’s.” The clause provides a general anecdote not related to the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They eat what ordinary people cannot afford.” The clause offers a general commentary on unaffordable goods.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Do my colleagues know how much he makes?” The clause is a question about a specific individual’s salary, not the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He makes twice as much as the Minister of Finance and National Revenue.” The clause compares a specific individual’s salary to a government minister’s.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He makes more than the Prime Minister.” The clause compares a specific individual’s salary to the Prime Minister’s.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He makes more than the Governor General and that is no mean feat.” The clause compares a specific individual’s salary to the Governor General’s.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is quite something.” The clause is a general expression of admiration for a salary.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In fact, our current Prime Minister’s financial-sector friend,” The clause introduces a specific political narrative not related to the bill’s policy substance.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “or colleague at least, earns $700,000 a year.” The clause states a specific salary figure regarding a political figure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Even that was not enough for him.” The clause describes the financial dissatisfaction of a specific individual.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Within six months, he was threatening to resign.” The clause recounts a specific incident involving a political figure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It was too little for him.” The clause describes the dissatisfaction of a specific individual.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In fact, he found out there were public servants in government.” The clause relates to the perception of public servants by a specific individual.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That was the last straw.” The clause references a specific turning point in the political narrative.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Since he was allergic to public servants, he started blackmailing the government.” The clause details accusations of blackmail by a specific individual.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In the end, he did not resign.” The clause states a specific outcome of a political dispute.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “He is still around.” The clause offers a status update on a specific individual.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Apparently, he is still in his office in Toronto.” The clause provides a detail about where a specific individual is based.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I do not know if he has ever been seen in the agency’s offices,” The clause provides a detail about the visibility of a specific individual.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but he is still there.” The clause confirms the presence of a specific individual at a location.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The funny thing is that an agency was created just for him.” The clause is part of the detailed anecdote regarding a specific individual.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is not even a law yet,” The clause is a general observation about legislative status.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Maybe it will become the “House of Guzman”.” The clause is a personal speculative remark.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is my take on all of this.” The clause is a summary statement by the speaker.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We know that the current CEO is very fond of his offices in Toronto.” The clause focuses on the preference of a specific CEO rather than C-40’s policy.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We do not know if that is where it will end up,” The clause is general speculation about the location.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but I hope not.” The clause expresses a personal hope.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “However, it seems that it will be up to the corporation to decide that later on.” The clause offers a vague prediction about future corporate decisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What would the limits be?” The clause is a rhetorical question used for transition.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I always find it interesting when people say that it will be at arm’s length from the government.” The clause is a personal commentary on the concept of independence.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We cannot make this stuff up.” The clause is an assurance that the information is factual.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are concerned about that.” The clause is a simple declaration of concern.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That seems like a lot of money to me.” The clause offers a personal opinion on the magnitude of the spending.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Calling for politics to be taken out of something is often a way to claim the moral high ground.” The clause makes a general observation about political rhetoric.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am not suggesting that it should be driven by patronage or handed out to Liberal Party cronies.” The clause is a disclaimer about the speaker’s intent regarding political hiring.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is what is likely going to happen:” The clause is a general assertion about what is likely to happen.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “the Prime Minister appoints one of his friends and wants as little accountability as possible.” The clause is a general critique of political behavior not tied specifically to C-40.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but we were also told that we were going to build more housing.” The clause discusses a separate government policy (housing).
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I call that slogan-based governance.” The clause is a general political critique of government messaging.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Every time there is a problem, the government makes grand promises and comes up with catchy slogans.” The clause is a general political critique of government messaging.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Ultimately, it does not produce tangible results.” The clause is a general political critique regarding results.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is the case, for example, with Build Canada Homes.” The clause provides an example of a past unrelated policy failure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We were told that 500,000 homes would be built.” The clause provides a statistic about an unrelated housing target.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The report we saw recently stated that we were quite far off and not even half the target had been reached.” The clause reports on the performance of an unrelated policy.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We keep creating new structures:” The clause is a general lament about government structure creation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “the financial crimes agency, Build Canada Homes, a defence bank, the Major Projects Office and the Canada strong fund—the much-vaunted sovereign wealth fund.” The clause lists several unrelated government structures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Normally, a sovereign wealth fund consists of money that has been saved.” The clause provides a general definition of a sovereign wealth fund.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In this case, however, it is being financed through borrowing.” The clause provides a detail about an unrelated financial structure.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are constantly seeing slogan-based governance, with too little attention paid to solving the real problems.” The clause offers a general political critique of government priorities.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is a serious problem.” The clause is a general commentary on the preceding facts.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I have a hard time making sense of what the government is presenting to us today.” The clause is a personal expression of confusion.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What we are also seeing with the creation of these new structures,” The clause transitions to a broad, non-specific critique of government structural creation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as I said, is a tendency on the part of this government to want to create new structures by saying that they represent a blank slate, that the government needs to be given a chance and that a blank slate is beyond reproach.” The clause makes a general critique of government rhetoric about ‘blank slate’ creations.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I find that rather troubling,” The clause is a personal statement of concern.
Respect · 100
0 of 99 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 96
1 of 99 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Hidden agency Wording that hides who did something, or who will. What the tags mean → “decisions being made increasingly behind closed doors” The passive names no actor for the decisions it warns about, leaving who decides unattributed.
Claims · 18
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “earns $700,000 a year” A colleague of the current Prime Minister earns $700,000 a year. search
2 “500,000 homes would be built” The government was told that 500,000 homes would be built. search
3 “not even half the target had been reached” A recent report stated that the Build Canada Homes target had not even half been reached. search
4 “four to 24 years to deliver a simple procurement project in Canada and from 10 to 28 years to deliver a complex one” According to an internal report from the Canadian Armed Forces, a simple procurement project takes anywhere from four to 24 years and a complex one takes from 10 to 28 years to deliver in Canada. search
5 “created under Bill C-31” The agency being discussed was supposed to be created under Bill C-31. search
6 “It is not even a law yet” Bill C-31 is not yet a law. search
7 “introducing Bill C-40 to scrap what was in Bill C-31 and create a new crown corporation” The government is introducing Bill C-40 to scrap the content of Bill C-31 and create a new crown corporation. search
8 “creating a new entity with a new board of directors and a new corporate headquarters” Bill C-40 is creating a new entity with a new board of directors and a new corporate headquarters. search
9 “have all sorts of powers, such as the power to make advance payments, provide loan guarantees, lend money and even buy company shares” The new Crown corporation established by Bill C-40 will have powers such as making advance payments, providing loan guarantees, lending money, and buying company shares. search
10 “for less than $1 billion, it will not even need to ask the government for permission unless explicitly requested by the government” For amounts less than $1 billion, the new Crown corporation will not need government permission unless explicitly requested. search
11 “Crown corporation will not need all the usual government approvals to proceed and move forward with its decisions” The new Crown corporation established under Bill C-40 will not require all the usual government approvals for its decisions. search
12 “the Treasury Board may not have a say” The Treasury Board may not have a say in the operations of the Crown corporation. search
13 “The bill says that it will create a defence agency that will be at arm’s length from the government” Bill C-40 states that it will create a defence agency that is at arm’s length from the government. search
14 “procurement ombud will not even have a say in the decisions that will be made by this new entity” The procurement ombud will not have a say in the decisions made by the new entity created under Bill C-40. search
15 “a company that believes it has been treated unfairly during the process will have no recourse because the Crown corporation will be the one that makes the decisions, period” A company treated unfairly during the process will have no recourse because the Crown corporation will be the one making the decisions. search
16 “did not resign” The individual discussed did not resign. search
17 “he is still in his office in Toronto” The individual discussed is still in his office in Toronto. search
18 “Canada is the only one that would require one” Canada is the only country among NATO and Five Eyes nations that would require a Crown corporation to manage military procurement. search