← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 84. The grade is held to 76, 30 above Relevance. 76 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
46 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
88 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 78% Promise 10% Reasoning 12%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 63 words we had the chance this summer to go to Inuvik to see how investments are already making a difference at the airport so that we are able to have our CC-330s land in the north and protect our north.1 We met with all the mayors and the regional first nations communities.2 We are also benefiting from all the money being spent up north. Promise · 8 words We will continue to invest in the north, Vague promise Reasoning · 10 words because it is our most important border at this time. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×5 Vague promise Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 46
5 of 6 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “we had the chance this summer to go to Inuvik to see how investments are already making a difference at the airport so that we are able to have our CC-330s land in the north and protect our north.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We met with all the mayors and the regional first nations communities.” The clause mentions meetings with regional communities but does not explain how the bill influences procurement.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are also benefiting from all the money being spent up north.” The clause discusses the financial benefits of spending in the North, but not the mechanism of procurement.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We will continue to invest in the north,” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “because it is our most important border at this time.” On the subject of the question, but no answer to what was asked can be drawn from it.
Respect · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 88
1 of 6 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “We will continue to invest in the north” The commitment lacks any specified measure, timeframe, or success criteria.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “this summer to go to Inuvik to see how investments are already making a difference at the airport so that we are able to have our CC-330s land in the north” In the summer of 2026 the member for the government visited Inuvik and saw airport investments that allow CC-330 aircraft to land in the north. search 2 “We met with all the mayors and the regional first nations communities” During the summer 2026 trip to Inuvik, the member met with local mayors and regional first nations communities. search
