Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Stephanie Kusie

117 words · 9 sentences · 10 clauses

Replying to Jeff Kibble (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, clause 9 of Bill C-40 says, “The [Defence Investment Agency] must do as the Minister directs”. It does not say “may”, but “must”. I am wondering if my colleague can tell me why this should cause concern to Canadians if the GlobalEye failure under the Defence Investment Agency’s current mandate predicts a path forward and to give an example of what we can, unfortunately, expect going forward under this new bill.”
Statement grade
D+
53 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 32%Procedure 17%Claims 14%Positioning 20%Aside 7%Reasoning 11%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 37 wordsI want to recognize the excellent work of our defence team, in addition to our associate defence minister for procurement, who has done a fantastic job in addition to the work of our shadow minister for defence.Thanks Procedure · 16 wordsThe answer is clear.Unearned certainty I will point out the change between Bill C-31 and Bill C-40.1Procedure Claims · 16 wordsIn Bill C-31, this position was not a minister, 2but was made so in Bill C-40.3Partly on point Procedure · 4 wordsThe reasoning is clear.ProcedureUnearned certainty Positioning · 23 wordsThe Liberals want more power for themselves.Off point They want the ability to do things unilaterally without having the checks and balances in place.PositioningPartly on point Aside · 8 wordsIt is no surprise to me at all.AsideOff point Reasoning · 13 wordsThe good issue that my colleague has raised is a question of control.Partly on point

Analysed on