“Mr. Speaker, when reached for comment, the minister said that “putting Canadian workers and industries first” was the heart of their buy Canadian policy. This does not look like either of those things. Instead, a $12-million contract went to a firm that does business with Donald Trump’s ICE instead of to a not-for-profit Canadian company, the largest employer of Canadian veterans. The question for the Liberals is this. Instead of creating employment opportunities for Canadian veterans and buying Canadian, why did they choose to put an American firm that has close ties to Donald Trump ahead of Canadians?”
Statement grade
B–
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 74 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 28%Claims 44%Promise 28%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 6 wordsthe member knows better than that.PositioningClaims · 9 wordsThis is a Canadian firm.It employs 8,000 Canadians.Promise · 19 wordsWe are always going to stand with veterans who have defended our country, including with respect to employment opportunities.Partly on pointVague promiseClaims · 10 wordsThe CRA process is independent and does not involve politicians.3Positioning · 13 wordsThe member knows that.We are always going to do what is right.PositioningPartly on pointVague promiseClaims · 11 wordsThis company is Canadian.1It employs 8,000 workers across this country.2