Analysis · Point of order · beta

Luc Berthold

Conservative on Points of Order 2026-10-20

95 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Procedure 14%Claims 65%The ask 21%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordsI rise on a point of order.Procedure Claims · 37 wordsDuring oral question period, the Minister of Jobs and Families misled the House by quoting me in her answer.¹ I must inform the House that I did not, in any letter, ask for a single additional worker.² Procedure · 6 wordsIt is important to correct that.Procedure Claims · 25 wordsI did not ask for a single additional worker in the letter I sent her. I asked the minister to show respect to current workers.³ The ask · 20 wordsIf she believes she is right, I seek the permission of the House to table the letter I sent her.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 83

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “I rise on a point of order.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business.What the tags mean “It is important to correct that.”Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the Minister of Jobs and Families misled the House by quoting me in her answer”During oral questions on 2026-10-20, the Minister of Jobs and Families quoted Luc Berthold in her answer.search
2“I did not, in any letter, ask for a single additional worker”Luc Berthold’s letter to the Minister of Jobs and Families did not ask for a single additional worker.search
3“I asked the minister to show respect to current workers”In the letter Luc Berthold sent the Minister of Jobs and Families, he asked the minister to show respect to current workers.search

Analysed on 2026-10-22