“Mr. Speaker, today we are discussing Bill C‑40, a procurement process that will be demolished by Bill C‑31, which will be passed because it is a budget bill, a confidence vote. Earlier today, the Standing Committee on Finance heard from the Secretary of State for Defence Procurement. I asked him why a new Crown corporation was needed for procurement, which runs counter to Bill C‑40. He replied that our companies do not want government contracts, but rather commercial ones. However, none of the Five Eyes countries or any other NATO member has a Crown corporation, or a state-owned enterprise, that handles procurement. That is evident from the fact that politicians will continue to control the procurement process. I would like my colleague to tell me why she is selling us this bill that Canadian businesses want nothing to do with. That is what the secretary of state said this morning.”
Statement grade
B+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 84 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 33%Reasoning 67%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 21 wordsI think the questions are as follows: Why create a Crown corporation?Why was the decision made to do that now?ProcedureReasoning · 43 wordsThe answer is that the goal is actually the opposite.Unearned certaintyI think the agency would have greater flexibility to negotiate and manage contracts using business practices better suited to the industry.It will also bring procurement and strategic investments under a single mandate.1
