← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little. Not graded
Signal
0 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 100%
Structure · 1 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Procedure · 26 words Yes, Mr. Speaker, we are prepared to give unanimous consent to split the time at third reading for the Conservatives once we get through report stage.1 Procedure
Signal · 0
1 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Yes, Mr. Speaker, we are prepared to give unanimous consent to split the time at third reading for the Conservatives once we get through report stage.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · no score
No score. Excluded from the average.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “we are prepared to give unanimous consent to split the time at third reading for the Conservatives once we get through report stage” Kevin Lamoureux said in the House on October 20, 2026 that the Liberals were prepared to give unanimous consent to split time at third reading of Bill C-38 with the Conservatives after report stage. search
