Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Kurt Holman

53 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, in response to my question earlier, my colleague mentioned that he was in favour of measures to help Canadians deal with the cost of living. I would like to ask him a simple question. If he is in favour of this type of measure, why did he vote against making the school food program permanent?”
Statement grade
B
77 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 45%Reasoning 55%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 24 wordsthe affordability crisis is there.2 I hear about it constantly from my constituents in London—Fanshawe.1 This crisis is also affecting Canadians as a whole.3 Reasoning · 29 wordsTherefore, with regard to Bill C-38 and removing taxes on diesel, it would be the first step in dealing with this affordability crisis that is taking place right now.Partly on point

Analysed on