Analysis · Members' statement · beta

Jenna Sudds

Liberal on National School Food Program 2026-10-21

128 words · 6 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

B+

81 / 100, held down by Signal

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 41%Positioning 16%Reasoning 15%Thanks 28%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 53 wordsearlier today, I had the pleasure of joining Brent Mansfield, the co-founder of LunchLAB and elementary school teacher, as he and a number of students ran 200 laps of the lawn of Parliament in support of our national school food program.¹ Earlier this year, our government made the national school food program permanent.² Positioning · 20 wordsI rise today proud of our government’s ongoing commitment to strengthening access to nutritious food in schools across our country.Positioning Reasoning · 19 wordsThe future starts with our children. Ensuring their bellies are full so they can focus on learning is essential. Thanks · 36 wordsI want to thank Brent, as well as the Coalition for Healthy School Food, the Ottawa Network for Education and all teachers and advocates who advocate with passion and dedication for school food across the country.Thanks

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 51

3 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “I rise today proud of our government’s ongoing commitment to strengthening access to nutritious food in schools across our country.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “I want to thank Brent,”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “as well as the Coalition for Healthy School Food, the Ottawa Network for Education and all teachers and advocates who advocate with passion and dedication for school food across the country.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“ran 200 laps of the lawn of Parliament in support of our national school food program”On 2026-10-21, Brent Mansfield and a number of students ran 200 laps of the lawn of Parliament in support of the national school food program.search
2“Earlier this year, our government made the national school food program permanent”In 2026, the government made the national school food program permanent.search

Analysed on 2026-10-22