Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Anna Gainey

Liberal on The Economy 2026-10-21

74 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Sandra Cobena (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, there are 2.4 million food bank visits in a single month. That is the highest ever recorded in this country, and one in three is for a child. What greater failure of a government’s economic record is there than that a parent who works all day still cannot provide for their children? After more than a year and a half under the Liberal Prime Minister, Canadians are working harder but falling further behind. Will the Prime Minister explain why, in a country such as Canada, honest work is no longer enough to provide for one’s family?”

Statement grade

47 / 100, held down by Relevance

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 22%Claims 78%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 12 wordstime and again, we take action on this side of the House.PositioningOff pointVague promise Claims · 58 wordsThe government has advanced a national child care strategy, dental care and a national school food program, among other efforts to help Canadians make ends meet.¹Partly on point Members opposite continue to vote against these things that have direct impacts on the people in their communities who rely on things such as checkups at the dentist and affordable child care.² Positioning · 4 wordsIt makes no sense.PositioningOff point

At a glance

Lost points for
Didn't answerNone of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.
Echo ×4“Dental care and the national school food program.” Said 4 times by 4 members.Every time it was said

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 74

2 of 7 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “time and again, we take action on this side of the House.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “It makes no sense.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 17

4 of 7 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.

Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “time and again, we take action on this side of the House.”Praise of the government’s own side in place of an answer to why work no longer provides.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “The government has advanced a national child care strategy, dental care and a national school food program, among other efforts to help Canadians make ends meet.”A list of the government’s affordability programs on the issue raised, not what was asked about why work is not enough.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “Members opposite continue to vote against these things that have direct impacts on the people in their communities who rely on things such as checkups at the dentist and affordable child care.”An attack on the opposition’s votes instead of an answer to the question.
Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate.What the tags mean “It makes no sense.”A remark about the opposition’s behaviour, not the question on living standards.

Respect · 100

0 of 7 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 80

1 of 7 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we take action”Claims the side is acting without naming any measure, date or success condition.

Echo · 1 repeated line

Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.

“Dental care and the national school food program.”Said 4 times by 4 members.Every time it was said

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“The government has advanced a national child care strategy, dental care and a national school food program”The Liberal government has advanced a national child care strategy, dental care and a national school food program.search
2“Members opposite continue to vote against these things”Conservative members have voted against government measures such as dental care and the national school food program.search

Analysed on 2026-10-22