← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity. Reasoning rests on 2 conclusions, too few to hold the grade down. Average 90 / 100
Signal
65 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
93 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 42% Positioning 29% The question 28%
Structure · 5 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 21 words starting November 3, under a new Liberal policy, corporations will not have to prove they tried to hire a Canadian first.2 Positioning · 23 words Instead, the Liberals are siding with corporations and institutions that do not want to put in the work to hire and train Canadians. Positioning Claims · 12 words They are doing this after 68,000 Canadians lost their jobs last month.1 The question · 22 words Can the immigration minister tell those 68,000 people why their government decided they do not even deserve to get a first look?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 65
1 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Instead, the Liberals are siding with corporations and institutions that do not want to put in the work to hire and train Canadians.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 93
0 of 1 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
Nothing lost points.
Conclusions found · 2
Conclusion “Instead, the Liberals are siding with corporations and institutions that do not want to put in the work to hire and train Canadians.”
Because “starting November 3, under a new Liberal policy, corporations will not have to prove they tried to hire a Canadian first.”
Conclusion “Can the immigration minister tell those 68,000 people why their government decided they do not even deserve to get a first look?”
Because “They are doing this after 68,000 Canadians lost their jobs last month.”
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “68,000 Canadians lost their jobs last month” 68,000 Canadians lost their jobs last month. search 2 “starting November 3, under a new Liberal policy, corporations will not have to prove they tried to hire a Canadian first” Starting November 3, corporations will not have to prove they tried to hire a Canadian first under a new Liberal policy. search
