Analysis · Point of order · beta

Andrew Lawton

Conservative on Irene Mathyssen 2026-10-22

29 words · 2 sentences · 2 clauses

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 72%The ask 28%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 21 wordsduring oral questions, the Minister of Jobs referenced a desire to see the correspondence I was referring to about food affordability.¹ The ask · 8 wordsI seek unanimous consent to table the letter— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the Minister of Jobs referenced a desire to see the correspondence I was referring to about food affordability”During oral questions on October 22, 2026, the Minister of Jobs said she wanted to see correspondence Andrew Lawton was referring to about food affordability.search

Analysed on 2026-10-24