← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 76. The grade is held to 52, 30 above Relevance. 52 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
84 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
22 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 12% Claims 61% Reasoning 28%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 14 words I would like to highlight my colleague’s remarks earlier this afternoon in this debate. Thanks Claims · 14 words I completely agreed with him when he said that it is necessary to learn. Reasoning · 23 words When things change, it is necessary to adapt. It is a bad idea to always fall back on formulas that do not work. Claims · 59 words By the way, I did not hear the discussion, Off point but the money that was supposed to come from those media outlets was not distributed.1 No one in the cultural sector benefited from it, because there were lawsuits.2 It went to court.3 That money could not be distributed to the cultural sector.4 Our cultural environment did not benefit from it. Partly on point Reasoning · 10 words That is why we decided to take a different approach.5 Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×6 Off point ×5 Thanks Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 84
1 of 12 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I would like to highlight my colleague’s remarks earlier this afternoon in this debate.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 22
11 of 12 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I completely agreed with him when he said that it is necessary to learn.” The statement offers a general opinion about the necessity of learning that does not relate to the tax negotiation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “When things change, it is necessary to adapt.” This statement offers a general principle about adapting to change, which is not tied to the tax withdrawal.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is a bad idea to always fall back on formulas that do not work.” The clause offers a general opinion regarding ineffective formulas without connection to the question’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “By the way, I did not hear the discussion,” The speaker mentions not hearing a discussion, which is a procedural note not relevant to the question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “but the money that was supposed to come from those media outlets was not distributed.” The clause addresses the status of money intended for media outlets, but not its impact on US negotiations.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “No one in the cultural sector benefited from it,” This refers to the benefit not received by the cultural sector, which is related to the tax money but not the negotiation outcome.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “because there were lawsuits.” The statement explains that legal action prevented the funds from being distributed, focusing on distribution rather than negotiation results.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It went to court.” The clause describes the legal process that occurred regarding the funds, which is tangential to the negotiation question.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That money could not be distributed to the cultural sector.” The statement asserts that the money was not distributed to the cultural sector, focusing on funding distribution rather than negotiation results.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Our cultural environment did not benefit from it.” The speaker notes the failure of the cultural environment to benefit, linking the lack of benefit to the tax subject, but not the negotiations.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is why we decided to take a different approach.” The clause discusses a strategic decision to adopt a different approach without relating it to the tax negotiations.
Respect · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the money that was supposed to come from those media outlets was not distributed” The money that was supposed to come from the media outlets was not distributed. search 2 “because there were lawsuits” Lawsuits existed regarding the disputed funds. search 3 “It went to court” A related financial matter went to court. search 4 “That money could not be distributed to the cultural sector” The money could not be distributed to the cultural sector. search 5 “we decided to take a different approach” The government decided to take a different approach regarding the funds. search
