Analysis · Speech on a bill · beta

Jason Groleau

1363 words · 98 sentences · 110 clauses

Statement grade
A
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 15%Claims 25%The question 4%Procedure 9%Aside 1%Reasoning 28%The ask 19%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Positioning · 176 wordswhen families in Beauce sit down to make their budget, they naturally begin with the essentials: groceries, housing, electricity, car payments, school supplies, clothing and all the other basic necessities. Then they look at what is left in their wallet and, unfortunately, they are forced to make choices. There are always choices to be made. They may have to postpone a repair, delay a purchase or cut back in one area simply to make ends meet in another. Meanwhile, in Ottawa, the Liberals are asking Parliament to approve a costly space launch bill that will grant the minister broader powers that could ultimately increase the burden on taxpayers. The Liberals talk about ambition. I want to talk about accountability. Before asking Canadians to finance its ambitions in space, the government should first confront the realities here on Earth. The people of Beauce work hard for every dollar they earn. They have a right to know how their money is being spent. More importantly, they have a right to ask questions before they are handed the bill.Positioning Claims · 66 wordsBill C-28 seeks to establish a legislative framework for space launch and re-entry activities in Canada.1 I believe that Canada has amazing engineers, researchers and businesses that are capable of doing great things. We can be proud of their work, and we do want to develop our capabilities, but an ambitious project must be based on sound rules. It has to pass a very simple test: The question · 16 wordsWill taxpayers get good value for their money? Is the Liberal government managing the money properly? Procedure · 16 wordsTake the case of Maritime Launch Services in Nova Scotia, which I have mentioned here before.Procedure Claims · 29 wordsThe government announced a $200-million agreement over 10 years to lease a specialized launch site and related services before even introducing Bill C-28.4 I repeat: It committed $200 million. Procedure · 56 wordsTo understand why this announcement raises questions, let us come back to the issue that my colleagues from Richmond—Arthabaska—des-Sources and Montmorency—Charlevoix and I raised here in the House before. The situation we described is based on observations made on March 21 by Marie Lumsden, a resident of Canso who went to the area with her camera.9Procedure Claims · 27 wordsThere is a gravel road, two shipping containers and a 25-foot-by-35-foot concrete pad. For reference, that is just about big enough to put a 21-foot trailer on. Positioning · 5 wordsThat is a striking image.Positioning Procedure · 5 wordsThen there are the numbers.Procedure Claims · 79 wordsMaritime Launch Services, a company in which a former Liberal holds shares, is leasing the land from the Province of Nova Scotia for $13,500 a year.6 Those are the facts. The federal government approaches this company with the great idea of leasing the property from it for $20 million a year.7 That is a fact, not a joke. Let me repeat, a company that leased the property for $13,500 is leasing it back to the government for $20 million.8 Aside · 7 wordsI see one of my colleagues laughing, AsideClaims · 31 wordsbut the worst part is that someone had the bright idea to sign a 10-year, $200-million lease for a bit of land with a 25- by 35-foot concrete pad on it.5 Reasoning · 35 wordsThat tells us everything we need to know about the Liberals’ financial management. Not a single business person in Beauce manages their money like that. If they did, they would soon go out of business. The question · 23 wordsWhy are the Liberals more careless with taxpayers’ money than a business person would be with theirs? Why are they not being transparent? The ask · 26 wordsWe want to know the contract terms. Who set the price and evaluated the alternatives? Who signed the contract? Who is responsible? Was the minister aware? Claims · 5 wordsWe all asked these questions. The ask · 9 wordsWho is responsible for this horrific expenditure of funds? Reasoning · 27 wordsA minister can call it a historic investment if they want, but every dollar still has to be justified, and $200 million is a lot of money. Claims · 6 wordsOttawa has announced millions of dollars, Positioning · 8 wordswhile families in Beauce are counting every penny.Positioning Reasoning · 67 wordsThat is why we are so keen to make sure public funds are managed properly. When families are having to defer necessary spending, they expect their government to exercise sound judgment before making new commitments. Families are not asking for handouts. They just want their efforts to be respected. People work hard. They are asking the government to respect their efforts and invest their tax dollars wisely. Claims · 74 wordsBill C-28 raises another question. What other financial risks could taxpayers be expected to bear in the future? The bill gives the minister the power to indemnify certain owners and operators for their liability to third parties for damage, when the minister deems it in the public interest to do so.2 It also makes it possible to grant certain exemptions and reduce the minimum amount of liability insurance an operator is required to carry.3 Procedure · 14 wordsIt is a bit technical, but behind these provisions lie two very practical questions: ProcedureThe ask · 21 wordsIf things do not go according to plan, who will foot the bill and how much could they have to pay? The question · 9 wordsWill taxpayers end up footing the bill yet again? Positioning · 13 wordsAre we going to put yet another expense on our grandchildren’s credit card?Positioning Reasoning · 42 wordsCanadians need to know the bounds of the commitments made on their behalf. They are the ones footing the bill, after all. They need to know how much of the risk falls on the company and how much may fall on them. The ask · 67 wordsIf government protection is necessary, the minister must be able to justify it. He must share the terms and conditions and be accountable for his decision. He also needs to explain how the risk is assessed before offering such protection. If the government intends to make taxpayers foot the bill when things go wrong, then it needs to explain the risks to them before signing the agreement. Reasoning · 90 wordsExercising this kind of caution is a normal part of everyday life for Canadians, Quebeckers and residents of Beauce. It should be normal for cabinet too. We also need to think about the businesses that would like to get involved in this industry. In Beauce, we are no strangers to taking risks. Sometimes business owners have to buy machinery, expand a plant, develop a product or seek out new markets. Before investing, they need to calculate their operating costs, purchases and expenses. Most importantly, they need to understand the rules. Procedure · 10 wordsMy colleague from Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna raised this concern.Procedure The ask · 78 wordsWhen financial protections depend on a minister’s discretionary decisions, different companies may find themselves in very different situations. What criteria will be used to determine whether protection is granted to one company and denied to another? How can a new operator verify whether it is being treated fairly compared to another company? The government must make these rules and criteria clear. A company must be able to plan its project knowing what requirements it will need to meet. Reasoning · 77 wordsIts competitors must be subject to comparable criteria. This is essential for attracting investment and enabling new players to establish themselves on an equal footing. An entrepreneur should succeed through hard work and good ideas. He or she should not need a contact at the minister’s office to secure contracts. Predictable rules instill confidence in businesses. Well-explained decisions and transparency instill confidence in citizens. The government has a responsibility to instill confidence in both of these groups. Procedure · 13 wordsThe Liberals also talk about sovereignty. We agree this is a serious issue.Procedure Claims · 12 wordsSpace technologies can be used for communications, research and, above all, defence. The ask · 14 wordsThe Conservatives are calling for more explicit guarantees when it comes to national security. Procedure · 4 wordsOur demands are simple.Procedure The ask · 48 wordsFirst, the terms of the $200-million agreement must be made public. Second, clear limits on the financial risks borne by taxpayers need to be established. Third, the government needs to lay out the same criteria for all businesses so they can invest with confidence and be treated fairly. Reasoning · 36 wordsThese are basic requirements when spending Canadians’ money. Personally, I would approach this issue with the same common sense that the people of Beauce apply to their own finances. Before spending money, we do the math. Claims · 8 wordsBefore making a commitment, we read the terms. Reasoning · 14 wordsWhen using someone else’s money, we have to answer for how it is spent.

Analysed on