Procedure 4% Thanks 6% Positioning 41% Claims 26% Promise 8% Aside 1% The ask 7% Reasoning 7%
Structure · 54 steps
Claims · 7
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Procedure · 5 words before I make my comments, Procedure Thanks · 23 words as some of the other speakers have done, I want to offer my condolences to and prayers for the people at CFB Wainwright. Thanks Positioning · 36 words What happened on the base last weekend is so tragic. While many suffered, I do not think people always appreciate, as in this House, the families behind the injured individuals and those who lost their lives. Positioning Off point Thanks · 34 words I also want to say a prayer for the families that have to deal with the uncertainty of those who are still sick and of whether and how those people are going to recover. Thanks Positioning · 5 words The same thing happens here. Positioning Claims · 16 words We are here all week. We are doing our thing and we are off to events, Positioning · 46 words but there are always family members back home who are the ones holding down the fort for us. I think it is appropriate that every chance we get to stand up in the House, we thank our spouses and families for the ultimate sacrifice they make. Positioning Off point Procedure · 6 words As we talk about this bill, Procedure Positioning · 36 words and I know it has been mentioned in a couple of comments, it is not that we are saying we should not be dealing with space and an opportunity for people to create a great industry. Positioning Claims · 18 words Our problem comes from the fact that the government does not have a great track record on transparency. Positioning · 27 words Part of the challenge we have right now is what we find when we start looking at what is going on and things that have come before. Positioning Promise · 21 words The government will announce a bill, and parts of the bill will be excellent and we will be supportive of it, Claims · 18 words and then what ends up happening is that this small piece called “transparency” seems to be an issue. Partly on point Aside · 10 words I could rhyme off 100 instances of things right now. Aside Claims · 12 words We could talk about the green slush fund that happened last year, 1 Positioning · 13 words or others from recent times. They were programs that seemed to make sense. Positioning Off point Procedure · 14 words Of course, we are transitioning and trying to figure out some of these things, Procedure The ask · 9 words so maybe we should be spending money on them. Off point Reasoning · 46 words However, the problem that happens as we are dealing with them is that there is a huge disconnect when it comes to accountability, how we are we going to follow up and how we are going to make sure that these things are follow through on. Partly on point Positioning · 29 words Our challenge is not that we should not be looking at doing more in space. I think all my colleagues around the House would agree that that seems reasonable. Positioning Claims · 40 words Our challenge is always that what we see happening more and more with the Liberal government is that Liberal ministers and those who have the ability to write cheques are the ones making sure that insiders profit, with little transparency. Positioning · 18 words That is our challenge as we look at these things and as the Liberals announce program after program. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 9 words We can go back to the WE sponsorship scandal.2 Positioning · 26 words There are so many things that have happened over the years that I think most Canadians should be concerned about when we start talking about legislation. Positioning Off point Claims · 13 words Maritime Launch Services in Nova Scotia has been mentioned by my colleagues before. Positioning · 80 words The question is, with all the Crown land available and everything that is made possible, how did it happen to be that particular piece? Why was that piece picked and not anything else? That is what we are talking about here. Partly on point As we look at the process of what happens in this House, the challenge is not that the idea is a good idea or a bad idea. Off point The challenge is how we are going to be accountable and transparent. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 10 words The government has not been very transparent in recent years. Off point Positioning · 15 words As we look at these things, we are looking at how we deal with them. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 55 words We see more and more power. We see more and more Liberal insiders seemingly doing better as a result of that while Canadians are struggling. We see that food bank use is at an all-time high in this country.3 We see that and think to ourselves, “How do we have money for all these things?” Off point Procedure · 10 words I am not talking about this one thing in particular, Procedure Claims · 18 words but we are writing all kinds of cheques all around the world. We spend money on foreign aid. Positioning · 14 words Not all foreign aid is bad; we are not saying that is the case, Positioning Reasoning · 27 words but the challenge is that we have struggles here at home that we need to deal with. We have struggles here at home that need our attention. Partly on point The ask · 48 words When we look at bills like this one, our challenge is not that we should not be looking at space travel in Canada. It is about who should be dealing with it. How should it be brought forward? Parliamentarians should also have opportunities to look at these things. Partly on point Claims · 86 words Canada has a proud history of exploring space; there is no question about that. We have launched satellites, like the Alouette I, 4 which was launched under the Diefenbaker Conservative government, making Canada the third country to design and build satellites.5 As mentioned in the House already, we have had astronauts like Chris Hadfield, Roberta Bondar and Jeremy Hansen.6 We have also had technology like the Canadarm.7 We have definitely had a proud history in this country of being able to deal with and work in space. Positioning · 75 words When we look at these things, we have to keep going back to how we are going to make the government accountable. How are Canadians going to make sure that we have an opportunity to see what has gone on and see what has happened? Partly on point We realize there is a real market for space launches; there is no question about that, but when decisions are made behind closed doors, that is the challenge we have. Positioning Partly on point The ask · 24 words We can look at other programs. We can look at some of the things that have gone on so far in terms of censorship. Claims · 51 words There have probably been at least a dozen bills since COVID through which the government has tried to introduce some form of censorship in what it is doing, whether it is looking at metadata or setting up different types of things to keep an eye out and do more around that. Promise · 12 words We will look at the challenges as we continue to question legislation. Off point Procedure · 9 words That is our job as opposition: to question legislation. Procedure The ask · 22 words We should not be challenged, we should not be chastised and we should not be given a hard time for wanting accountability. Off point Positioning · 87 words As we move forward on this, one thing we need to constantly remind people of is that we are definitely in favour of enhancing our sovereignty and space capabilities, but we are certainly not supportive, and never will be supportive, of laws that could potentially give Liberal insiders and foreign agents blank cheques. I would just like to remind people that we were all sent here for a reason, and that is to do the best job we can when it comes to legislation in this House. Positioning Claims · 15 words As the opposition, we are required to ask questions. We are required to scrutinize bills. Positioning · 47 words We should never have to worry about being challenged because we are asking too many questions or are not asking the right questions. I said at the start of my speech that the Liberal government does not have a great track record when it comes to transparency, Positioning Promise · 21 words so we are going to continue asking questions on this side of the House. We are going to keep challenging legislation. Positioning · 19 words As I said, it is our duty as opposition to make sure that we are able to do that. Positioning Off point Procedure · 4 words In closing, once again, Procedure Promise · 45 words as we look at other legislation that is going to come forward over time, we are not going to slow down. We are not going to stop challenging. We are not going to stop asking questions. Off point We are going to continue to do our job, Reasoning · 20 words which is our due diligence. We were sent here by Canadians to ask questions and to challenge the status quo. Promise · 15 words As long as we are here in opposition, we will continue to do just that. Thanks · 12 words I want to thank you, Madam Speaker, for giving me time here. Thanks Procedure · 14 words I see my time is almost up, so I will just finish with that. Procedure Thanks · 11 words I appreciate the opportunity to speak once again in the House. Thanks
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×38 Positioning ×35 Partly on point ×23 Procedure ×9 Thanks ×4 Aside
Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 43
49 of 110 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “before I make my comments,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “as some of the other speakers have done, I want to offer my condolences to and prayers for the people at CFB Wainwright.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What happened on the base last weekend is so tragic.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “While many suffered, I do not think people always appreciate,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “as in this House, the families behind the injured individuals and those who lost their lives.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I also want to say a prayer for the families that have to deal with the uncertainty of those who are still sick and of whether and how those people are going to recover.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The same thing happens here.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but there are always family members back home who are the ones holding down the fort for us.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I think it is appropriate that every chance we get to stand up in the House, we thank our spouses and families for the ultimate sacrifice they make.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “As we talk about this bill,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and I know it has been mentioned in a couple of comments, it is not that we are saying we should not be dealing with space and an opportunity for people to create a great industry.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Part of the challenge we have right now is what we find when we start looking at what is going on and things that have come before.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “I could rhyme off 100 instances of things right now.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “or others from recent times.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They were programs that seemed to make sense.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Of course, we are transitioning and trying to figure out some of these things,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Our challenge is not that we should not be looking at doing more in space.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I think all my colleagues around the House would agree that that seems reasonable.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is our challenge as we look at these things and as the Liberals announce program after program.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “There are so many things that have happened over the years that I think most Canadians should be concerned about when we start talking about legislation.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The question is, with all the Crown land available and everything that is made possible, how did it happen to be that particular piece?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Why was that piece picked and not anything else?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is what we are talking about here.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As we look at the process of what happens in this House, the challenge is not that the idea is a good idea or a bad idea.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The challenge is how we are going to be accountable and transparent.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As we look at these things, we are looking at how we deal with them.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I am not talking about this one thing in particular,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Not all foreign aid is bad;” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “we are not saying that is the case,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “When we look at these things, we have to keep going back to how we are going to make the government accountable.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “How are Canadians going to make sure that we have an opportunity to see what has gone on and see what has happened?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We realize there is a real market for space launches;” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “there is no question about that,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but when decisions are made behind closed doors, that is the challenge we have.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “That is our job as opposition:” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “to question legislation.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As we move forward on this, one thing we need to constantly remind people of is that we are definitely in favour of enhancing our sovereignty and space capabilities,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “but we are certainly not supportive,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and never will be supportive, of laws that could potentially give Liberal insiders and foreign agents blank cheques.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I would just like to remind people that we were all sent here for a reason,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and that is to do the best job we can when it comes to legislation in this House.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We should never have to worry about being challenged because we are asking too many questions or are not asking the right questions.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I said at the start of my speech that the Liberal government does not have a great track record when it comes to transparency,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As I said, it is our duty as opposition to make sure that we are able to do that.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “In closing, once again,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I want to thank you, Madam Speaker, for giving me time here.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I see my time is almost up,” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “so I will just finish with that.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I appreciate the opportunity to speak once again in the House.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 37
61 of 110 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “What happened on the base last weekend is so tragic.” The statement refers to a tragedy that is not related to the space launch bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “While many suffered, I do not think people always appreciate,” This clause offers general commentary regarding the appreciation of families involved in a non-related event.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as in this House, the families behind the injured individuals and those who lost their lives.” The statement continues the sentiment of the preceding clauses regarding an unrelated tragedy.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The same thing happens here.” This is a vague reference to a subject previously discussed, which is not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are here all week.” The statement provides a general update on the parliamentary schedule.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are doing our thing and we are off to events,” This clause provides a personal commentary on the speaker’s schedule and activities.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but there are always family members back home who are the ones holding down the fort for us.” This offers personal commentary on the speaker’s family while in the House.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I think it is appropriate that every chance we get to stand up in the House, we thank our spouses and families for the ultimate sacrifice they make.” The clause offers a general tribute to families, unrelated to the bill’s subject matter.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Our problem comes from the fact that the government does not have a great track record on transparency.” The clause raises a concern about the government’s transparency record, which impacts legislative trust but is not specific to the bill’s content.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Part of the challenge we have right now is what we find when we start looking at what is going on and things that have come before.” The speaker raises a general challenge regarding past governmental conduct and its influence on current policy.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The government will announce a bill,” This clause refers to government legislative activity generally before addressing the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and parts of the bill will be excellent and we will be supportive of it,” The speaker states they will support parts of the bill, contingent on their assessment.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and then what ends up happening is that this small piece called “transparency” seems to be an issue.” The speaker raises a concern that transparency might be an issue with the current legislation being considered.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I could rhyme off 100 instances of things right now.” This is a rhetorical remark and does not address the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We could talk about the green slush fund that happened last year,” The statement refers to a specific unrelated government fund or program.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “or others from recent times.” This refers to other unrelated programs or events.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They were programs that seemed to make sense.” This offers a general comment on the sense of past governmental programs.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “so maybe we should be spending money on them.” This offers general commentary regarding government spending priorities.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “However, the problem that happens as we are dealing with them is that there is a huge disconnect when it comes to accountability, how we are we going to follow up and how we are going to make sure that these things are follow through on.” The speaker raises a concern about governmental accountability regarding policy execution, which is relevant to new legislation.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Our challenge is always that what we see happening more and more with the Liberal government is that Liberal ministers and those who have the ability to write cheques are the ones making sure that insiders profit, with little transparency.” This raises a critique of government spending and transparency regarding insider profits, impacting policy trust but not the bill itself.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That is our challenge as we look at these things and as the Liberals announce program after program.” This continues the discussion regarding the challenges of governmental policy announcement and implementation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We can go back to the WE sponsorship scandal.” The speaker references a specific unrelated political scandal.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There are so many things that have happened over the years that I think most Canadians should be concerned about when we start talking about legislation.” This offers a general concern for Canadians regarding government conduct across all legislation.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “That is what we are talking about here.” The speaker is referring back to the site selection process discussion and its implications.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As we look at the process of what happens in this House, the challenge is not that the idea is a good idea or a bad idea.” This shifts the focus from the bill’s merits to the parliamentary process of debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The challenge is how we are going to be accountable and transparent.” The speaker focuses on the procedural and governance challenges associated with developing such policy.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The government has not been very transparent in recent years.” The speaker offers a general criticism regarding the government’s level of transparency in recent years.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “As we look at these things, we are looking at how we deal with them.” The speaker refers to the complex governmental challenges surrounding the policy debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We see more and more power.” This is a general observation about increases in government power.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We see more and more Liberal insiders seemingly doing better as a result of that while Canadians are struggling.” The statement provides a political critique regarding government insiders and public difficulty.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We see that food bank use is at an all-time high in this country.” The statement cites social economic data unrelated to the space launch bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We see that and think to ourselves, “How do we have money for all these things?”” This questions the government’s spending capacity based on unrelated socio-economic issues.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “but we are writing all kinds of cheques all around the world.” The speaker mentions government spending globally, touching on fiscal responsibilities related to space programs.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We spend money on foreign aid.” The speaker discusses spending government funds on foreign aid, which relates to overall government expenditure.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Not all foreign aid is bad;” The speaker provides a nuanced view on the appropriateness of foreign aid spending.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “we are not saying that is the case,” The speaker provides a qualified perspective on the nature of foreign aid.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “but the challenge is that we have struggles here at home that we need to deal with.” The speaker raises domestic spending priorities relative to global expenditures, which influences budget allocation for space.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have struggles here at home that need our attention.” This reiterates the need for the government to focus on domestic needs, impacting fiscal policy for the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It is about who should be dealing with it.” The speaker discusses the issue of who should oversee or manage the space activities established by the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “How should it be brought forward?” The speaker questions the proper mechanism and procedure for bringing space policy forward.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Parliamentarians should also have opportunities to look at these things.” The speaker emphasizes the need for parliamentary oversight of space-related matters.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “When we look at these things, we have to keep going back to how we are going to make the government accountable.” The speaker returns to the theme of government accountability regarding the space program’s development.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “How are Canadians going to make sure that we have an opportunity to see what has gone on and see what has happened?” The speaker asks how public oversight of governmental space activities can be ensured.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “but when decisions are made behind closed doors, that is the challenge we have.” The speaker raises a concern about decision-making transparency when it occurs privately, which impacts the bill’s implementation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We can look at other programs.” The reference to other programs is too vague to relate to the bill’s specific contents.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We can look at some of the things that have gone on so far in terms of censorship.” The speaker shifts the discussion to a topic of censorship, which is separate from the regulatory framework of space launch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There have probably been at least a dozen bills since COVID through which the government has tried to introduce some form of censorship in what it is doing, whether it is looking at metadata or setting up different types of things to keep an eye out and do more around that.” The speaker discusses government legislative efforts regarding data and privacy, not the bill’s regulatory powers.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We will look at the challenges as we continue to question legislation.” The statement is a general declaration of how the opposition intends to operate in Parliament.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We should not be challenged, we should not be chastised and we should not be given a hard time for wanting accountability.” This is a political argument regarding the speaker’s right to ask questions in the House.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I would just like to remind people that we were all sent here for a reason,” This is a general rhetorical point about being in Parliament.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and that is to do the best job we can when it comes to legislation in this House.” The statement is a general comment regarding legislative duties in the House.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As the opposition, we are required to ask questions.” This is a general statement about the opposition’s procedural rights.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are required to scrutinize bills.” This is a general statement regarding the required duties of the opposition in Parliament.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We should never have to worry about being challenged because we are asking too many questions or are not asking the right questions.” The statement is a generalized argument regarding the rights of a backbench member.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I said at the start of my speech that the Liberal government does not have a great track record when it comes to transparency,” This is a repeat of the general criticism regarding government transparency made earlier in the speech.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “so we are going to continue asking questions on this side of the House.” This is a general declaration of intent to question the government on all matters.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are going to keep challenging legislation.” The statement is a general commitment to challenge future legislation regardless of its subject matter.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As I said, it is our duty as opposition to make sure that we are able to do that.” This is a procedural statement concerning the speaker’s duty to the opposition.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as we look at other legislation that is going to come forward over time, we are not going to slow down.” The speaker discusses intentions regarding future legislation broadly, not the specific bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are not going to stop challenging.” The speaker states a general commitment to continued legislative opposition.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are not going to stop asking questions.” The speaker states a general commitment to continued questioning.
Respect · 100
0 of 110 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 110 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 7
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the green slush fund that happened last year” A controversy referred to as the ‘green slush fund’ occurred in 2025. search
2 “the WE sponsorship scandal” A controversy involving WE and the government, referred to as the WE sponsorship scandal, occurred in Canada. search
3 “food bank use is at an all-time high in this country” Food bank use in Canada is at an all-time high. search
4 “We have launched satellites, like the Alouette I” Canada launched the Alouette I satellite. search
5 “which was launched under the Diefenbaker Conservative government, making Canada the third country to design and build satellites” Alouette I was launched under the Diefenbaker Conservative government, making Canada the third country to design and build satellites. search
6 “we have had astronauts like Chris Hadfield, Roberta Bondar and Jeremy Hansen” Chris Hadfield, Roberta Bondar and Jeremy Hansen have been Canadian astronauts. search
7 “We have also had technology like the Canadarm” Canada developed the Canadarm technology. search