Analysis · Members' statement · beta

Kevin Lamoureux

Liberal on Cancer Research 2026-10-23

150 words · 8 sentences · 11 clauses

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Thanks 10%Positioning 16%Reasoning 45%Claims 29%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Thanks · 15 wordsI would like to give a special thanks to Dr. Kent Stobart from CancerCare Manitoba.Thanks Positioning · 24 wordsHe and his staff members truly care about what is happening in Canada, and particularly in Manitoba, with respect to how we treat cancer.Positioning Reasoning · 26 wordsIt is so critically important that as a nation, we invest in research for cancer. It could help save lives and make lives that much better. Claims · 34 wordsOne example that was demonstrated to me was taking a cell out, injecting it with something that combats cancer directly and reinserting the cell to fight the cancer directly, as opposed to having chemotherapy. Reasoning · 7 wordsThe point is, research gives us results. Claims · 10 wordsCanada made a commitment of $5 billion over three years.¹ Reasoning · 34 wordsThis is the type of thing we can use to build the capital infrastructure to ensure we get more research on things like cancer and the cure for cancer, Vague promisewhich are vital to Canadians.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 68

3 of 4 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “I would like to give a special thanks to Dr. Kent Stobart from CancerCare Manitoba.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “He and his staff members truly care about what is happening in Canada,”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “and particularly in Manitoba, with respect to how we treat cancer.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 4 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 74

1 of 4 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “to ensure we get more research on things like cancer and the cure for cancer”The statement commits to a generalized outcome without specifying the metrics for success or the exact measures to achieve that goal.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Canada made a commitment of $5 billion over three years”Canada committed $5 billion over a span of three years to research.search

Analysed on 2026-10-24