Analysis · Members' statement · beta

Jacques Gourde

Conservative on Cost of Living 2026-10-23

144 words · 9 sentences · 11 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 96 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 57%Reasoning 10%Promise 24%Positioning 8%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 57 wordsafter 11 years of Liberal taxes and inflationary spending, Canadians are facing ever-higher costs for food, housing and transportation while their wages are not keeping up. Food banks recorded an all-time high of 2.35 million visits in March, including nearly 776,000 visits by children.¹² Inflation hit 3.1% in September, ³and gas prices jumped 27.8% in one year.⁴ Reasoning · 15 wordsWhen fuel costs go up, it is farmers, truckers and families who pay the price. Claims · 25 wordsMeanwhile, the federal debt continues to weigh heavily on future generations, and interest payments are swallowing up billions of dollars that could be serving Canadians.⁵ Promise · 35 wordsConservatives want to put money back into families’ pockets, extend the federal fuel excise tax holiday, eliminate the GST on gas and diesel, scrap the industrial carbon tax and scrap the costly clean fuel regulations. Positioning · 12 wordsCanadians work hard. Canadians deserve better. They deserve a future Conservative government.Positioning

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 89

3 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Canadians work hard.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Canadians deserve better.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “They deserve a future Conservative government.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 5

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Food banks recorded an all-time high of 2.35 million visits in March”Food banks recorded an all-time high of 2.35 million visits in March.search
2“including nearly 776,000 visits by children”Food bank visits in March included nearly 776,000 visits by children.search
3“Inflation hit 3.1% in September”Inflation hit 3.1% in September.search
4“gas prices jumped 27.8% in one year”Gas prices jumped 27.8% in one year.search
5“interest payments are swallowing up billions of dollars”The federal government’s interest payments are amounting to billions of dollars.search

Analysed on 2026-10-24