← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 97 / 100
Signal
90 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 7% Claims 60% The question 20% Reasoning 13%
Structure · 7 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Positioning · 7 words the Liberal government is spending without restraint. Positioning Claims · 37 words It has added $700 billion in national debt over the last 10 years, 1 but it is adding another $733 billion over the next five.2 The Liberals are costing us an additional $82,000 of debt per Canadian household.3 The question · 4 words What is the outcome? Claims · 22 words It is a record 2.4 million visits to the food bank in a single month.4 That is the highest in Canadian history.5 Reasoning · 13 words If spending was the solution, surely Canadians would be better off by now. The question · 16 words What good is all this spending when the very Canadians paying for it are getting poorer?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 90
1 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “the Liberal government is spending without restraint.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “added $700 billion in national debt over the last 10 years” The Liberal government added $700 billion in national debt over the last 10 years. search 2 “adding another $733 billion over the next five” The Liberal government is adding another $733 billion in debt over the next five years. search 3 “costing us an additional $82,000 of debt per Canadian household” The Liberal government is costing Canadian households an additional $82,000 of debt. search 4 “a record 2.4 million visits to the food bank in a single month” There were 2.4 million visits to the food bank in a single month. search 5 “That is the highest in Canadian history” The 2.4 million visits to the food bank in a single month is the highest in Canadian history. search
