← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 75. The grade is held to 51, 30 above Relevance.
51 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
79 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
21 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 14% Claims 49% Positioning 6% The question 31%
Structure · 9 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 5 words I appreciated my colleague’s speech. Thanks Claims · 12 words As noted, she is somebody who has a background in chemical engineering. Thanks · 19 words I have always appreciated that about her, as well as her ability to get facts, figures and everything else. Thanks Claims · 36 words She talked in her speech about the increases in oil, gas and mining that are going to happen here, and of all the sensors that are going to have to be part and parcel of that. Positioning · 4 words All of those sensors, Positioning Partly on point Claims · 36 words and she would know this, have an embedded carbon price, as does the increased production of oil and gas, in particular, to make sure we have a baseload in a reliable energy system in this country. Positioning · 6 words Since she has crossed the floor, Positioning The question · 54 words and I am going to ask the member this question very clearly, has she managed to convince the rest of her new colleagues over there that this whole green shift economy is a bit of a myth and that we need to build a sustainable economy in Canada that depends on oil and gas? Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×4 Thanks ×3 Partly on point ×3 Positioning ×2
Off topic Only 8% of this speech directly addressed the bill under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 79
5 of 12 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I appreciated my colleague’s speech.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I have always appreciated that about her,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “as well as her ability to get facts, figures and everything else.” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “All of those sensors,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Since she has crossed the floor,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 21
7 of 12 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “She talked in her speech about the increases in oil, gas and mining that are going to happen here,” About a colleague’s remarks on coming oil, gas and mining growth, touching measurement devices only in passing.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and of all the sensors that are going to have to be part and parcel of that.” About sensors required for resource expansion, which relate to meters only in passing, not the bill’s measures.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “All of those sensors,” Refers to those sensors generally, without addressing the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and she would know this, have an embedded carbon price,” About an embedded carbon price in sensors, which the bill does not touch.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as does the increased production of oil and gas, in particular, to make sure we have a baseload in a reliable energy system in this country.” About carbon pricing and energy system reliability, subjects outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Since she has crossed the floor,” About the member’s crossing the floor, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and I am going to ask the member this question very clearly, has she managed to convince the rest of her new colleagues over there that this whole green shift economy is a bit of a myth and that we need to build a sustainable economy in Canada that depends on oil and gas?” A question about the green shift economy and oil and gas policy, which the bill does not address.
Respect · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 12 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.