← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 96 / 100
Signal
89 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 67% The question 11% Positioning 8% The ask 13%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 27 words speaking of hypocrisy, this morning, Canada signed a joint statement condemning the genocide-like violence in Sudan that is being committed by the Rapid Support Forces, 1 or RSF. The question · 11 words Who is the primary supplier of military equipment to the RSF? Claims · 38 words It is the United Arab Emirates, whose crown prince the Prime Minister of Canada is hosting tonight.2 3 This morning, Canada condemned the massacres, but tonight, it is hosting a banquet in honour of one of the people responsible. Positioning · 8 words Once again, Canada is downplaying human rights abuses. Positioning The ask · 13 words Will the Prime Minister at least raise this issue at his event tonight?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 89
1 of 1 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Once again, Canada is downplaying human rights abuses.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 1 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “this morning, Canada signed a joint statement condemning the genocide-like violence in Sudan” On the morning of 26 October 2026, Canada signed a joint statement condemning violence in Sudan attributed to the Rapid Support Forces. search 2 “the United Arab Emirates” The United Arab Emirates is the primary supplier of military equipment to the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan. search 3 “the Prime Minister of Canada is hosting tonight” The UAE crown prince was being hosted by Canada’s Prime Minister in Ottawa on the evening of 26 October 2026. search
