Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Michelle Rempel Garner

Conservative on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2026-10-26

109 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Statement grade

Average 77 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 41%Claims 26%The question 33%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 42 wordsI think it is very telling that the Prime Minister will not even let his immigration minister give basic details about an open borders pact with the EU.Positioning If he has nothing to hide, why will he not let her stand up?Motive imputed Claims · 28 wordsThe reality is he made an announcement in the European parliament.¹Unearned certainty He is not giving our press gallery details about it in our papers or in interviews here. Positioning · 3 wordsCanadians deserve answers.Positioning The question · 36 wordsHow many more non-citizens will come into the country? What will be the categories of non-citizens and what does this mean for provinces, like Alberta or Quebec, that are asking for more control over immigration levels?²

At a glance

Lost points for
Personal attackThis statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “If he has nothing to hide, why will he not let her stand up?”.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 64

2 of 4 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “I think it is very telling that the Prime Minister will not even let his immigration minister give basic details about an open borders pact with the EU.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Canadians deserve answers.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 82

1 of 4 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Claiming to know a person’s bad motives.What the tags mean “If he has nothing to hide, why will he not let her stand up?”This question implies that the Prime Minister and Minister are hiding something, thereby attacking their honesty.

Clarity · 86

1 of 4 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.What the tags mean “The reality is”The statement asserts a fact without providing any evidence or source for the claim.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“he made an announcement in the European parliament”The Prime Minister made an announcement in the European parliament about an immigration pact with the EU.search
2“provinces, like Alberta or Quebec, that are asking for more control over immigration levels”Alberta and Quebec are asking for more control over immigration levels.search

Analysed on 2026-10-28