← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Reasoning, Respect and Clarity is 73. The grade is held to 63, 30 above Reasoning. 63 / 100, held down by Reasoning
Signal
78 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Reasoning
33 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
80 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 16% Claims 54% The question 30%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 18 words it is high time that the Liberals and the Prime Minister explained the Liberals’ gross hypocrisy on immigration. Positioning Claims · 59 words Over the course of 11 years, the Liberals dismantled a system that was working well. No reason given The Prime Minister told the New York Times, but not the House, that it is time to increase immigration.1 Meanwhile, he is drawing closer to the European Union, 2 which, coincidentally enough, has also lost control of immigration and lost track of millions of people. No reason given Unearned certainty The question · 33 words What is the agreement with the European Union? Is Canada deporting immigrants who follow the rules because ministers have mishandled the file, all to make room for more immigrants from the European Union?
At a glance
Lost points for No reason given ×2 Positioning Unearned certainty Unsupported This statement drew 3 conclusions, but gave no reasons for 2 of them.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 78
1 of 4 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “it is high time that the Liberals and the Prime Minister explained the Liberals’ gross hypocrisy on immigration.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Reasoning · 33
2 of 4 deductions are Reasoning
Reasoning checks for sound logic and solid support for any conclusion. A low score means the speaker made unsupported leaps or used weak arguments.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “Over the course of 11 years, the Liberals dismantled a system that was working well.” The statement presents this as a claim of policy failure without providing specific figures or events to back it up.
No reason given A conclusion stated with no reason given for it. What the tags mean → “which, coincidentally enough, has also lost control of immigration and lost track of millions of people.” The statement asserts the EU has lost control and tracked millions of people without offering supporting data or events.
Conclusions found · 3
Conclusion “it is high time that the Liberals and the Prime Minister explained the Liberals’ gross hypocrisy on immigration.”
Because “Over the course of 11 years, the Liberals dismantled a system that was working well.”
“but not the House, that it is time to increase immigration.”
Conclusion “Over the course of 11 years, the Liberals dismantled a system that was working well.”
Because No reason given
No reason given The statement presents this as a claim of policy failure without providing specific figures or events to back it up.
Conclusion “which, coincidentally enough, has also lost control of immigration and lost track of millions of people.”
Because No reason given
No reason given The statement asserts the EU has lost control and tracked millions of people without offering supporting data or events.
Respect · 100
0 of 4 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 80
1 of 4 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “lost control of immigration and lost track of millions of people” The speaker presents these sweeping claims about the state of the European Union as established facts without providing verifiable evidence.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “it is time to increase immigration” The Prime Minister stated to the New York Times that it is time to increase immigration. search 2 “drawing closer to the European Union” The Prime Minister is drawing closer to the European Union. search
