← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 89% The question 11%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 5
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 79 words today first nations chiefs are in Ottawa at the first nations-first ministers meeting.1 A main topic of concern is Bill C-39, which first nations across the country have called to be withdrawn, including BCAFN, UBCIC,Treaty 6, Onion Lake, NAN, COO, APNQL and the Iroquois Confederacy representing hundreds of thousands of first nations.2 3 Chiefs have been clear that the success of this meeting will be judged by the Liberal government’s actions.4 The resource minister says that he respects indigenous rights, 5 The question · 10 words so will he withdraw Bill C-39 now, yes or no?
At a glance
Nothing lost points.
Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 5
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “today first nations chiefs are in Ottawa at the first nations-first ministers meeting” First Nations chiefs attended the First Nations First Ministers meeting in Ottawa today. search 2 “BCAFN, UBCIC,Treaty 6, Onion Lake, NAN, COO, APNQL and the Iroquois Confederacy representing hundreds of thousands of first nations” The organizations BCAFN, UBCIC, Treaty 6, Onion Lake, NAN, COO, APNQL, and the Iroquois Confederacy called for the withdrawal of Bill C-39. search 3 “representing hundreds of thousands of first nations” The First Nations organizations cited by the speaker represent hundreds of thousands of First Nations. search 4 “the success of this meeting will be judged by the Liberal government’s actions” First Nations chiefs stated that the success of the First Nations First Ministers meeting will be judged by the Liberal government’s actions. search 5 “The resource minister says that he respects indigenous rights” The Resource Minister stated that he respects Indigenous rights. search
