“Mr. Speaker, in listening to the Conservatives debate this piece of legislation, I find that it is almost as if they want to find a way to vote against it. Crown corporations, whether at the national level or provincial level, have provided all forms of services to Canadians. The Prime Minister has made very clear the commitment to grow our Canadian Forces and to support our Canadian Forces. Let us take a look at our military industry as a whole and how it can benefit by a Crown corporation. It does not take away from accountability. We can still ask questions of the ministers and the parliamentary secretaries. We can still see the Crown corporations come before standing committees. Crown corporations at both the national level and provincial level have proven to be very successful. Why is the Conservative Party deciding to vote against—”
Statement grade
C+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 79. The grade is held to 67, 30 above Signal.
67 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 59%Claims 41%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 53 wordsthe member says that the Conservative Party is trying to find an excuse to vote against this bill.1The reality is that the Liberal government wants to hand over a bill for us to blindly approve.Unearned certaintyCanadians sent us here to ask questions and get answers, answers we unfortunately do not often get.PositioningClaims · 44 wordsThe issue with Crown corporations was clearly laid out by the Parliamentary Budget Officer.2She is non-partisan.This is an independent body reviewing our country’s books, and she has raised alarms about the amount of debt the Prime Minister is hiding in Crown corporations.3Positioning · 10 wordsHe seems to want to continue to do the same.Positioning
