“Mr. Speaker, first of all, I want to thank the member for his advocacy for veterans. I do not know anybody who has been stronger as an advocate for our vets over the last number of years. This is what Liberals do with a bill like this. When they really do not want to do something, they say, “You know, we need a law in order to do the right thing”, when they could be doing the right thing as it is. When Liberals really want to do something, the Prime Minister just does it on his own. Whether he wants to be an EU associate member or have a gun grab, he just does it, but when the Liberals do not want to do something, they create a need for a bill. Is another bill really necessary for another bureaucracy for the government to do the right thing when it comes to military procurement?”
Statement grade
A
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 88%Reasoning 12%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 58 wordsthe answer is simply no.The bottom line is that the men and women of the armed forces need the equipment to do their jobs.Unearned certaintyThey do not need more bureaucracy.The bill proposes to create more bureaucracy, 1but it does not necessarily propose to get the men and women the equipment they need to do their jobs, Reasoning · 8 wordsand that is the problem with the bill.
