← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 58. The grade is held to 56, 30 above Signal. 56 / 100, held down by Signal
Signal
26 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
46 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
58 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 9% Procedure 6% Positioning 57% Claims 21% Promise 7%
Structure · 8 steps
Claims · 0
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 9 words I thank my colleague for his very relevant question, Thanks Procedure · 6 words and I will address its premise. Procedure Positioning · 14 words What we are doing is redistributing wealth, ensuring that everyone has an equal opportunity. Positioning Claims · 20 words Through taxes, we are taking more money from the pockets of those who have more financial flexibility and redistributing it. Positioning · 31 words For me, it is a question of fairness and ensuring that all children, regardless of their background, can access the same kind of service. Vague promise I believe this rebalancing is very important, Positioning Promise · 7 words and we will continue along this path. Vague promise Positioning · 10 words We truly believe that everyone should have an equal opportunity. Positioning Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×6 Positioning ×4 Vague promise ×2 Thanks Procedure Little substance Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 26
6 of 14 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Thanks Thanks and tributes. What the tags mean → “I thank my colleague for his very relevant question,” Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “and I will address its premise.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What we are doing is redistributing wealth, ensuring that everyone has an equal opportunity.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “For me, it is a question of fairness and ensuring that all children, regardless of their background, can access the same kind of service.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I believe this rebalancing is very important,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We truly believe that everyone should have an equal opportunity.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 46
6 of 14 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “What we are doing is redistributing wealth, ensuring that everyone has an equal opportunity.” The statement describes a policy of wealth redistribution rather than addressing the macro root causes of the cost of living.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Through taxes, we are taking more money from the pockets of those who have more financial flexibility and redistributing it.” This details the mechanism of taxation and redistribution rather than explaining how root economic causes are examined.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “For me, it is a question of fairness and ensuring that all children, regardless of their background, can access the same kind of service.” The focus is on social fairness and equal opportunity, which is a consequence of the cost of living, not the root economic cause.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I believe this rebalancing is very important,” The statement expresses support for the chosen policy path but does not confirm addressing the root causes.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and we will continue along this path.” The speaker commits to continuing the current policy direction of redistribution.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We truly believe that everyone should have an equal opportunity.” This expresses a general philosophy on opportunity rather than addressing the specific economic roots of the cost of living.
Respect · 100
0 of 14 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 58
2 of 14 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “ensuring that all children, regardless of their background, can access the same kind of service” The speaker makes a broad commitment to an outcome that lacks defined measures or mechanisms for verification.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “we will continue along this path” The speaker commits to future action without specifying the goals or defining what the path entails.
Claims · 0
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
No checkable claims.
