Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Jamil Jivani

Conservative on Concurrence in Committee Reports 2026-10-27

108 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Carlos Leitão (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, if there is one thing we can agree on, it is that the Canadian economy is indeed under severe stress. That stress is coming from the trade war. That stress is coming from the pressure of our trusted neighbour, which now wants to make sure that our manufacturing sector goes back to the United States. Of course, that is not going to happen. If we want to increase the creation of jobs for young people, we have to address the elephant in the room, and that is the attack that Canada is under from our trusted neighbour. This is just a comment, not really a question.”

Statement grade

76 / 100, held down by Signal

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 49%Claims 19%Reasoning 15%Promise 18%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 33 wordsit is time for the Liberal government to reflect on the fact that the Canadian people are not falling for this anymore. The Liberals are being held accountable for what they have done.PositioningPartly on point Claims · 20 wordsPremier Eby just lost an election in British Columbia pulling the same shenanigans that the Prime Minister tries to do, ¹Positioning · 20 wordswhich is to blame all of Canada’s problems on another country and take no responsibility for his own bad policies.Positioning Reasoning · 16 wordsYoung people deserve better, and that is why we have put forward the ideas we have.Vague promise Promise · 19 wordsIt is so that the government might do its best job possible to do right by our young people.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 46

3 of 6 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “it is time for the Liberal government to reflect on the fact that the Canadian people are not falling for this anymore.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “The Liberals are being held accountable for what they have done.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “which is to blame all of Canada’s problems on another country and take no responsibility for his own bad policies.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 80

2 of 6 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “it is time for the Liberal government to reflect on the fact that the Canadian people are not falling for this anymore.”A general claim that Canadians are not falling for the government, not engaging the comment’s points about the trade war or youth jobs.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “The Liberals are being held accountable for what they have done.”A general claim of accountability, not addressing the stress on the economy or jobs for young people raised in the comment.

Respect · 100

0 of 6 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 85

1 of 6 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we have put forward the ideas we have”The speaker’s own commitment names no measure, date or success condition for the ideas claimed.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Premier Eby just lost an election in British Columbia”Premier David Eby’s NDP recently lost an election in British Columbia, shortly before October 27, 2026.search

Analysed on 2026-10-29