Analysis · Debate question · beta

Dan Mazier

62 words · 3 sentences · 5 clauses

Following a speech by Ryan Turnbull (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, just over a month ago, the member opposite posed a nearly identical question during Adjournment Proceedings. I will respond by giving him a nearly identical answer. As the Minister of Health announced in June, our government believes that Canadians deserve transparency and openness when it comes to how taxpayer dollars are spent. That is to be expected. There were obviously concerns with whether Canadians had received value for money when it comes to Canada Health Infoway, which is why the Minister of Health announced a multiphase review that included both an independent audit and a third party review of the organization’s governance and structure. The member opposite was a member of the health committee when Liberal, Bloc and Conservative MPs unanimously called for the Auditor General to look at the organization in question. What was the Auditor General’s response? She said that the reviews announced by the minister are enough for her and that any other work by her would be duplicative and of limited value. Let us allow that work to take place and make sure that the review and the audit show what is working and what is not so that we can be sure that we have modernized health data infrastructure that works best for Canadians.”
Statement grade
B+
Average 84 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 16%Claims 58%The question 26%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 10 wordsI am really glad the member mentioned the June story, ProcedureClaims · 36 wordsbecause in June, the Liberals told The Globe and Mail that they were launching an independent third party audit of Canada Health Infoway after Conservatives exposed the $300-million PrescribeIT scandal.1Partly on point That was over 130 days ago.2Off point The question · 16 wordsHas the government actually hired a third party auditor, and if so, who did it hire?

Analysed on