Analysis · Question Period answer · beta

Mélanie Joly

80 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to John-Paul Danko (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, Hamilton is proud to be Canada’s steel city. It is part of who we are. This is— Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Mr. Speaker, we are talking about real jobs for real people, and this disruption is extremely disrespectful. Hamilton is proud to be Canada’s steel city, and thousands of families depend on steelmaking. It— Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Mr. Speaker, this is a critical issue for all Canadians, and it would be nice if the opposition were interested in what is happening. In the face— Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Mr. Speaker, Hamilton is proud to be Canada’s steel city. Thousands of families depend on steelmaking for their livelihood. In the face of the illegal and unjustified American tariffs, can the Ministry of Industry give the House an update on what our government is doing to protect Canada’s steel industry and support steelworkers?”
Statement grade
B
Average 76 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 29%Claims 35%Promise 36%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 23 wordswe know that the steel industry helped build this country. We have it as a pivotal industry as we are building Canada strong.PositioningPartly on point Claims · 28 wordsLast week, I joined the Prime Minister and the Premier of Ontario to announce an additional $5.2 billion to support the steel industry from the unjustified American tariffs.12 Promise · 29 wordsWe will make sure that people in Hamilton get that support, that we create growth in the country and, more importantly, that we create jobs across the steel industry.Vague promise

Analysed on